The table below gives figures for student applications and acceptances for UK university course in the field of tourism, transport, and travel.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.
The given table depicts pupil registration and acquiescence for UK post-educational programs in terms of tourism, transport, and travel in the time frame from 2000 to 2002.
Overall, there were differences in the number of students between 2 sexes who applied and were admitted for these college programs over the 3-year period. However, the general trends were a decline in total amount of requests and an incline in acceptances. This phenomenon suggested a lower competing rate among individuals.
In details, the quantity of men overwhelmed the women applicants. Nevertheless, the gap between these sexes reduced significantly after 3 years, from 2,500 down to 2,000 pupils. Additionally, the number of males dropped dramatically by 650 people, while registration from females observed a slight decrease, by 150 students.
In contrast, there was little changes in the difference in number of 2 sexes got admitted into the courses by the year 2002. Furthermore, the amount of men and woman candidates both marginally fluctuated, which eventually increased by 30 and 20 students respectively. Ultimately, a percentage data indicated a remarkable raise in the total acceptance rate by 5.9% during the same period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-07 | thaovuphuong19 | 79 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of river water in UK rivers that is classified as having good chemical quality between 1990 and 2002 72
- When children start school teachers have more influence on their intellectual and social development than their parents To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The graph below shows the number of new homes built in a particular region in the UK from 2010 and the figure predicted for 2020 51
- Most of the world’s poor live in countries where tourism is a growing industry. The issue is that tourism does not benefit the poorest.How can the income generated by tourism benefit the poor? And how can we ensure that tourism does not destroy traditio 67
- The table below gives information about the use of different modes of transport in Shanghai in 1996, and one possible projection (high motorization scenario) for their use in 2020.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1041.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53723404255 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19603842461 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648936170213 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.6346547477 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.1 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111978204863 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0348144382447 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571358769115 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0723465308721 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703642808242 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.