In order for any work of art—for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song—to have merit, it must be understandable to most people.
Can any works of art be understandable if they have merits? The speaker unfairly generalizes. In some areas, especially common art works opened to the public, they should be understandable to most people. In other areas, particularly the ancient masterpieces, the works’ value still exist although few people can understand the true meaning of them. Therefore, it is untenable to demonstrate whether most people should understand the art works without considering specific issues.
Common art works which are aimed to make profits should be understandable by the public. In terms of movies, sales of Avenger keep ahead of other films at the same time because of the popularity. One significant factor of Avenger’s success is the understandable main thesis; on the ground of making sense of Avenger, people would like to pay more attention to its absorbing plots and excellent performance of actors. Besides, most people prefer to read some painting books rather than appreciate famous art works in the gallery. Comic books such as Detective Conan is one of the pervasive painting styles; it added some detective but understandable plots to the comics, attracting more people to be Conan fans. Last but not least, in the field of literature, most people might choose to read understandable books at first. Tuesday with Morrie, a brief memoir of a dying professor: the content is easy to be comprehend because of using a myriad of conversation; furthermore, the book makes a big process of the sales because it highlights the topic of death which is close to everyone.
Although most people should apprehend the common art works, some arcane masterpieces don’t need to be understandable. Some experimental movies such as Empire cannot be apprehensive by the public, however, the unique film style of Andy Warhol create a new art form to describe the internal value of the images; until now, more and more directors apply this style to express feelings and emotions of specific objects. Meanwhile, in terms of paintings, on the ground of color and light, Van Gogh added emotions and feeling factors to develop the post impressionism. Although Van Gogh’s paintings did not acquire support of the public at that time, and few people could understand the value of his works in the current society, his valuable achievements cannot be ignored by the elusive painting concepts. In the field of literature, some ancient edified works such as One Hundred Years of Solitude which is only be understandable by some professional scholars; even though few people can comprehend the inspiring value of magic realism, the author of one hundred of solitude still to be the laureate of the Nobel Prize.
In a nutshell, it is necessary for most people to understand the common art works. However, the value of arcane art works cannot be ignored although few people can comprehend them.
- In order for any work of art—for example, a film, a novel, a poem, or a song—to have merit, it must be understandable to most people. 50
- Unfortunately, in contemporary society, creating an appealing image has become more important than the reality or truth behind that image. 79
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, but by the general welfare of its people. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of death which is close to everyone. Although most people should apprehend th...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, still, therefore, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 58.6224719101 123% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2435.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 470.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18085106383 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65612321451 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94607026623 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 229.0 215.323595506 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487234042553 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 753.3 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.4974548346 60.3974514979 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.157894737 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7368421053 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36842105263 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248553205075 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973146362594 0.0831039109588 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0909594994207 0.0758088955206 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183451276163 0.150359130593 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0686091143376 0.0667264976115 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.