The Chart below shows the global sales of different kind digital games from 2000 to 2006.
The bar chart illustrates the information about four types of digital games (mobile phone games, online games, console games and handheld games) which were sold all over the world from 2000 to 2006 at 01-years interval.
According to the chart it can be seen that handheld game was the most popular game which was sold approximately 12 billion in 2000, after which steadily increased till the end of the year. While, in 2000 online games were not available but, in 2001 online games came in the market which was sold almost 01 billion in its first year which gradually enhanced nearly 10 billion throughout the entire period.
Furthermore, sale amount of console game began with nearly 06 billion which decreased their level off in each year with slightly difference and fell around 03 billion till 2006. Comparatively, in 2000, mobile phone game was under 05 billion that marginally sales level increased approximately 07 billion in entire period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | dolzoo | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-21 | stefan ielts | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | Kamal1993 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | Muhammad Waleed Khan | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-08 | Milan karki | 73 | view |
- Many working people get little or no exercise either during the working day or in their free time, and have health problem as a result. Why do many working people not get enough exercise? What can be done about this problem? 73
- Nowadays in many countries women have full time jobs. Therefore, it is logical to share household tasks evenly between men and women. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- People are less fit and active nowadays then in the past. What are the reasons for this? What measures can be taken to fix this? 73
- The pie charts and table give information about the total value and source of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000. 56
- Eating too much sugar is harmful for health. Some people think that it is government responsibility to limit people’s sugar consumption, while others think that it is individual responsibility to limit the amount of sugar they eat. Discuss both views an 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 797.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07643312102 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47913930406 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59872611465 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 27.2616947382 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.4 112.824112599 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.4 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 5.23603664747 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225621342584 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132429050172 0.103423049105 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549705687992 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167957378047 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513092105877 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.78 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.