summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they answer the specific problems the specific problems presented.
The reading and lecture are both about some paintings that have been attributed to Rembrandt. Whereas the author of the reading states that ‘portrait of an elderly woman in a white Bonnet’ was not painted by Rembrandt though it has been attributed to him, the lecturer suggests that the painting was officially made by Rembrandt but certain modifications were done to it. The lecturer casts doubt on the main points made in the reading by providing following three reasons.
First of all, according to the reading, there is inconsistency in dressing style of the servant in the portrait. In the painting she wears a luxurious fur coat that a normal servant cannot afford. However, the lecturer disputes this point. She says that from thorough re-examination of the painting, the X-ray of pigments used have shown that the fur coat was not made in the original painting. Furthermore, she mentions that, since some people wanted to make it look formal, they have added it.
Secondly, the reading states that Rembrandt made proper combination of light and shadow unlike the painting that had shown the face illuminated with dark fur collar below the face. The face should appear darker as the dark fur collar would absorb light rather than reflecting it. Nevertheless, the lecturer refutes this argument. She argues that, in original painting made by Rembrandt there was no fur coat, instead the woman was wearing white collar cloth that illuminated her face.
Finally, the reading claims that the painting was made on a panel made of several wood pieces glued together. Rembrandt never paints on wood panels glued together. On the other hand, the lecturer says that in order to make painting look more grand and valuable, several pieces were glued. In addition, she points that the wood belonged to same tree used by Rembrandt.
In Conclusion, although the reading and the lecture both argue about whether some paintings that have been credited to Rembrandt were originally painted by him or not, the three main points made in the reading are effectively challenged by the lecturer.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-11 | Shreya Nuguri | 3 | view |
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developi 50
- Students should fund their education with part-time work that they do while they study. 83
- A recent study indicates that children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the United States, despite the fact that people in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal re 55
- coastal wetland 55
- Color photography has eliminated the need for realism in artistic painting in the opinion of a number of art scholars and artists At the same time many members of the art community still feel that realistic artwork is still valuable and worthwhile 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 486, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...collar cloth that illuminated her face. Finally, the reading claims that the pai...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, look, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, whereas, in addition, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 5.04856512141 59% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 22.412803532 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1757.0 1373.03311258 128% => OK
No of words: 345.0 270.72406181 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09275362319 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60888244098 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486956521739 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 520.2 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.2412080277 49.2860985944 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.352941176 110.228320801 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2941176471 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23529411765 7.06452816374 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.27373068433 211% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0585574983318 0.272083759551 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0238856825723 0.0996497079465 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0243630100958 0.0662205650399 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0386090729888 0.162205337803 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00753709069895 0.0443174109184 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.3589403974 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.8541721854 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.0289183223 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.