Some people think that higher institutions should concentration more on academic subjects such as history and the physical sciences, while others think that they should concentrate more on practical subjects such as car mechanics and cookery, etc.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion
There are different opinions on whether higher education must mainly focus on theoretical subjects or the practical ones. Although some individuals argue that the latter is more beneficial since it equips students with more real life experiences, others state the value of science might not be as obvious but undoubtedly cannot be denied. In the following, I will present both groups arguments, and finally give my own point of view.
On the one hand, science in its pure form, i.e., mathematics, physics, and so on, may not appear in human everyday lives. For example, for becoming a well-known chef, one does not need to be able to master math and know how to solve a three dimensional problem as much as he is expected to differentiate various flavors and make the best combination. Therefore, He better spend his time learning through hand on practices and try-and-error rather than wasting his time in a physics classroom which is not only boring to him but also useless. Besides, demands in society for skilled workers who provide daily services such as pluming, constructing, painting is higher than the request for scientists and researchers. Hence, educational facilities must train more people to answer that demand.
On the other hand, every piece of technology that had made our lives thousands times easier is an evident proof of science effectiveness. People have gotten used to these commodities so much that they can imagine living without them. Nevertheless, all these great inventions most of the time got for granted and people fail to see the talented researchers who have dedicated their life to achieve those discoveries. In addition, learning mathematics and similar subjects broaden person's horizon. It does not matter that you probably never ever encounter those problems in your life. They are train your brain and ready you to comprehend and defeat other challenges in your life.
In conclusion, although some subject may seem impractical, they are good for your brain and help you to become a more knowledgeable and well-rounded person.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-13 | b.yousefi | 89 | view |
| 2019-06-11 | harmankaur | 89 | view |
| 2019-04-26 | BIBHU KALITA | 73 | view |
- On a recent holiday you lost a valuable item Fortunately you have travel insurance to cover the cost of anything lost Write a letter to the manager of your insurance company In your letter Describe the item you lost explain how you lost it tell the insura 69
- The only way to improve safety on our roads is to give much stricter punishments for driving offenses.What extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are the reasons for this? What can be done to change this negative attitude towards international tourism? 89
- For school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Some people think that school should reward students who show the best academic results, while others believe that it is more important to reward students who show improvements. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 793, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rain more people to answer that demand. On the other hand, every piece of techno...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... knowledgeable and well-rounded person.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, finally, hence, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1744.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19047619048 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81561461454 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657738095238 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4083213864 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.266666667 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143974202822 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0446258149736 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390535165183 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0915379189697 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287585546615 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.