In town and cities, the large shopping mall should replace the small shop, do you agree or disagree?
The importance of large shopping mall should replace small local shop which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while reject this notion. This essay will further elaborate both aspect of this trend and this will lead to logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reason which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant stems from the fact that large shopping mall replace small shop beneficial for some merchandiser as well as big large malls have good materials and expensive clothes therefore rich people give more preference to large malls. Another pivotal aspect for the argument is that large mall have good infrastructure with superior design and also very good atmosphere for us therefore large mall replace small local shops because small shops have not good material for rich people. Needless to say, all that all these merits stand of large shopping mall should replace small local shop in a good stead.
However, there are some pitfalls that negate this argument and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but the most alarming is that if large mall replace the local shops than it is not good for small merchandiser. Besides, small shops have cheap grocery and clothes in less price compare to big malls. As an illustration, people should purchase everything for small shop and save lot of money. It is apparent why many are against large shopping mall should replace small local shop.
According to the argument aforementioned above, one can reach a conclusion that the benefit of large shopping mall should replace small local shop are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, the potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-10-17 | Jaskaransingh11 | 72 | view |
- polygamy has increased widely in recent years what solution can you brought forward to decrease this issue. 77
- polygamy has increased widely in recent years what solution can you brought forward to decrease this issue. 77
- Drawbacks of over packaging. Give your opinions? 77
- advantages or disadvantages of credit card. Do you agree or disagree 72
- there are both problems and benefits for high school student study plays and works of theather writtes centuries 55
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 31.9359605911 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 283.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2296819788 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53531537402 2.71678728327 93% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491166077739 0.580463131201 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 446.4 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.7197570833 50.4703680194 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.545454545 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7272727273 20.9669160288 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27272727273 7.25397266985 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.432705642857 0.242375264174 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.225197991972 0.0925447433944 243% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.128031320647 0.071462118173 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.314304151774 0.151781067708 207% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.072683296546 0.0609392437508 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.1260098522 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.32886699507 96% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 55.0591133005 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 9.94827586207 191% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.