The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012.
The line graph gives information about the proportion of exports from Australia to four different nations in the 1990-2012 period.
Overall, although China and India were two nations which had the lowest figures at the starting point in 1990, China led the chart in the percentage of Australian exports in 2012. While the figures of India and China had increases between 1990 and 2012, those of two remaining nations decreased in this period.
At the starting point in 1990, the percentage of Australian exports to India was the lowest, at around 1%, compared to nearly 2% of China. In contrast, the highest proportion was Japan, at roughly 27%, which was higher than US by approximately 14%.
After 22 years, in 2012, China witnessed a miraculous growth and rose to the top of the chart, at precisely 30%. Besides, the figure of India also slightly increased to around 6%, which was still lower than that of US, at nearly 7%, a small difference by 1%. After a sharp decrease in 1995, the percentage of exports from Australia to Japan dropped to around 18%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-27 | IVANTRUONG | 11 | view |
| 2019-10-18 | nguyenduchuy2705 | 67 | view |
| 2019-08-06 | Law Tran | 67 | view |
- Some people think that cultural traditions will be destroyed if they are used as money-making attractions aimed at tourists. Others, however, believe that is the only way to save these traditions. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 56
- Research suggests that the majority of criminals who are sent to prison commit crimes when set free What are the reasons What can be done to solve the problem 61
- The diagram below shows the changes which took place in a coastal area called pentland from 1950 and 2007 Write a report for a university lecturer describing the diagrams below
- The graph below shows the average class size in six countries and compares it with the world average class size in 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main points and give comparisons where relevant 67
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world What are the reasons for this and how can people learn more about the natural world 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, so, still, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 885.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86263736264 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5457117811 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.7070336019 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 110.625 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240249949955 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116988203539 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916739141842 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163970654921 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0626403964104 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.