Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down. Others however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
While a school of thought holds that zoos have a crucial role to play in the protection of wildlife, others claim keeping wild animals in such places is cruel. From my perspective, I agree with the idea that animals should not be kept in captivity and that zoos should be shut down.
On the one hand, there are several reasons to believe that zoos play an important role in protecting wild animals. Firstly, zoos could contribute to the preservation of endangered species by keeping them safe from poachers and their predators. Secondly, given the fact that in the wild, some animals have difficulty finding mates and breeding, many zoos have run breeding programs to support them in these activities. Thirdly, thanks to zoos, people and animals are brought together. This exposure could not only help people develop a deeper understanding of wildlife but also instill in them a love of animals. As a result, more people would participate in the protection of wild animals.
However, I doubt the effectiveness of zoos in saving animals. First and foremost, it would be more beneficial for animals to live in their natural habitat rather than be locked up in cages for their entire life. Since the animals are deprived of their natural habitat, many of them can not acclimatize themselves to the new environment; therefore, they can not survive. Furthermore, in some zoos, animals are provided with insufficient food and medical care, which likely causes them to die due to starvation and diseases. Lastly, if zoos are constructed predominantly for entertainment purposes, they may teach the young generation that confining animals in zoos for our own sake is acceptable.
In conclusion, although zoos could make contributions to the conservation of animals, I am convinced that they might be counterproductive; therefore, they should be close down.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-03 | nguyenduchuy2705 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | Ngoc Khanh Ong | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-18 | tran ngoc lam | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-24 | AnCourses | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-22 | linh.king | 73 | view |
- In the future it seems it will be more difficult to live on the earth Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live such as Mars To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 95
- Some people think that the best way to increase road safety is to increase the minimum age for driving cars or riding motorbikes. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports, while others think peopleshould have freedom to do any sports or activity.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies Do you agree or disagree 95
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, third, thirdly, while, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1562.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17218543046 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93650927237 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572847682119 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0429402928 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.571428571 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0714285714 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319252081098 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108808645459 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0673168165305 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205613478163 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463196222664 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.