Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting. The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect. In your opinion, which of the following is the best thing to do?
1）Interrupt and correct the mistake right away
2）Wait until the class or meeting is over and the people are gone, and then talk to the teacher or meeting leader
3）Say nothing
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Speaking in front of a large crowd is a challenging task because of several factors that lead them to make mistakes such as fear, anxiety. If I were noticed an error in the talk, I would wait until the end to clarify it instead of asking on the spot. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, interrupting an individual’s speech may cause distraction, and the speaker may lose their line of talk. In many conference, people often ask questions in the middle of the conversation, which are not related to the topic, and some don’t understand the lecturer’s point. As a result, the lack of coherence in the speak and misleads the entire topic. Besides, some audience asks a funny question during serious talk. Consequently, it distracts the speaker and the audience. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. When I was studying at the university, I had an opportunity to talk on graduation day regarding the Aluminus. I prepared well and gathered all the necessary information, which required me to speak accurately. But, during the presentation, a student asked me about the university grading system, which wasn’t related to my topic. Consequently, I started answering his question instead of talking about actual topic.
Secondly, respect is most prominent in any culture, and interrupting other speech is disrespectful, especially in front of a broad audience. Though it is a fantastic idea to correct the mistake and lets every audience know the accurate information, it is an awful movement for the speaker. In many cultures, questioning a lecturer in the middle of the talk indicates that the questioner is arrogant and selfish. For instance, In my country India, the audience are not allowed to cast a doubt in the middle of the talk.Moreover, Speaker allots seperate time for questions at the end. To be specific, when I was studying for a master’s degree, I raised a question middle of the talk. My professor was so serious and sent me out of the class, and later I wrote an apology letter.
In conclusion, although asking questions is an excellent idea, when to asks the question is essential. It is always a fantastic idea to asks the question at the end of the session. This is because of respect to the speaker and because of avoiding distraction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | daoistwang | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | naziii | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | naziii | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | kkang | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Bonjourkmm | 3 | view |
- Early twentieth century Chaco construction purpose. the professor refutes the reading claims mentioned in the passage. 3
- some people believe parents are the best teacher and others not. which one do you agree? support with examples and reasons 76
- rococo architects impact on nineteenth century 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Children over the age of 15 should be allowed to vote. 86
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun conference seems to be countable; consider using: 'many conferences'.
Suggestion: many conferences
...speaker may lose their line of talk. In many conference, people often ask questions in the midd...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
.... As a result, the lack of coherence in the speak and misleads the entire topic. Besides,...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 372, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...in the middle of the talk indicates that the questioner is arrogant and selfish. ...
^^
Line 5, column 520, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Moreover
... cast a doubt in the middle of the talk.Moreover, Speaker allots seperate time for ques...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 544, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dle of the talk.Moreover, Speaker allots seperate time for questions at the end. ...
^^
Line 7, column 72, Rule ID: ASK_THE_QUESTION[1]
Message: Use simply 'asks' instead.
Suggestion: asks
...questions is an excellent idea, when to asks the question is essential. It is always a fantastic ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 137, Rule ID: ASK_THE_QUESTION[1]
Message: Use simply 'asks' instead.
Suggestion: asks
...ntial. It is always a fantastic idea to asks the question at the end of the session. This is beca...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, first, if, may, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, such as, talking about, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 43.0788530466 72% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.0752688172 272% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1963.0 1977.66487455 99% => OK
No of words: 397.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94458438287 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07876785244 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513853904282 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 612.9 618.680645161 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3747813934 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2272727273 100.406767564 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0454545455 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.13636363636 5.45110844103 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.032700083481 0.236089414692 14% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0103851272888 0.076458572812 14% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0199264791143 0.0737576698707 27% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.021860880891 0.150856017488 14% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0163029260483 0.0645574589148 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 11.7677419355 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 58.1214874552 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 10.9000537634 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.