Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
The engraved past is often considered to drive the future generations, and is considered to be a great teacher. Some believe that the lessons of history dwell by providing great insights and values for the current and future generations. This essay will state as of why the past has value for the people at present.
Past provides us a pattern which can be analyzed to define and understand a process. Many concepts in science and technology are derived from patterns or past experience. Further, the studies also show that the analysis of past data or patterns yield information about previously unknown things. For instance, the concept of Darwin’s evolution was developed via connecting the dots from the past, the work of Darwin provides us the explanation of how the evolution takes place. The work was in a way incomplete as it was not able to provide explanation to many of the prevailing phenomenon, the improvements on his work are still based on past work and evidence which help us understand how the process of evolution works on a greater level. Therefore, the past provides us with invaluable insights which can be used to define and understand a particular process.
Second, Past learning provide us better solutions to our problems. Many of the technologies used today are still based on the techniques and solutions provided by the philosophers of the past. For instance, the method of remainder theorem was developed by Chinese mathematicians which were initially of no use to the “modern scientist”. However, the current knowledge of Chinese remainder theorem (also known as CRT) is widely used in the field of computer security to solve complex problems of exponentiation. Further, the current scientific research also deals with usage of “Literature Review” or “Prior Arts” which forms a basis of the current research, at times the researchers aim to use the knowledge of these learnings and apply it to their solutions. Thus, the knowledge of past provides us with better solutions to future problems.
The past learning is important because it can be used to describe a particular phenomenon and foster application to our day-to-day life. In conclusion, the learning of the past are of highest value in the modern world, the seminal work of different philosophers will help provide solutions to our problems and bolster the current knowledge in the field.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-12 | Pandalove | 70 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Majid1369708090 | 76 | view |
| 2019-10-22 | swapnil.paliwal | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-26 | S_Daftari | 80 | view |
| 2019-04-24 | Shazli | 83 | view |
- Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed. 66
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. 66
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people's efficiency so that they have more leisure time. 66
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people's efficiency so that they have more leisure time. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 155, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...technology are derived from patterns or past experience. Further, the studies also show that th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 23, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to provide'
Suggestion: to provide
...lar process. Second, Past learning provide us better solutions to our problems. Ma...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 182, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the highest'.
Suggestion: of the highest
...onclusion, the learning of the past are of highest value in the modern world, the seminal ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, still, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 72.0 52.1666666667 138% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2039.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 391.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21483375959 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0665462903 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468030690537 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 635.4 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 14.0 3.08781362007 453% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.1652280913 48.9658058833 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.941176471 100.406767564 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17647058824 5.45110844103 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178944335838 0.236089414692 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702852903179 0.076458572812 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0328016369804 0.0737576698707 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114578821435 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00644220535694 0.0645574589148 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 11.7677419355 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 86.8835125448 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.