Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present. Do you agree or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

As everything in life is like a coin that has two different sides, people must weigh the pros and cons before jumping to conclusions. Nevertheless, some adamantly believe it is not worth it to know about what happened earlier, others believe that it's always useful to carefully have the past time understood. In my humble opinion, getting to absorb and digest your past is beneficial for the following compelling reasons;

The majority of individuals would agree with the notion that old is gold. In other words, our heritage is an inevitable resource that we have to utilize. To further explain, not many countries have a civilization like the one established by the ancient Egyptians. That's why The Egyptian Government always allocate a significant part of its yearly budget to conserve this treasure and know more about it. By doing so, the Egyptians fully understood the value behind their unique heritage. Consequently, Nowadays, the government and many voluntary organizations are launching many campaigns all over the world to encourage people across the globe to visit Egypt depending on the interesting and mysterious stories about their ancient civilization. Those activities succeeded to grab the world's attention toward the African nation which is generating enormous revenue as a result of this action. All in all, what have been accomplished in the past can impact the future significantly.

On top of this, understanding old slips are likely to serve you do the right things in the future. To better explain, most of today`s inventions have witnessed a dramatic transformation compared to its primitive form. Take desktops as an example; computers used to be enormous that cannot even fit in a whole room. Also, they possessed a tiny storage capacity, and they tend to offer a low-quality performance. Nowadays, nonetheless, many of us have a hand-sized notebook that can be carried in just a small pack back, these small laptops can function much better than two or three of the giant computers used before. This is because experts have investigated what has been done wrong and what could be changed in order to design a high-quality device. All in all, lessons from the past can always direct us to the right path.

No doubt that well-understanding of our history and wisely treating it is advantageous. Not only will it enable communities to reach prosperity via getting that knowledge fully exploited, but it will also allow more advanced and developed discoveries to arise by defeating errors occurred in the past.

Votes
Average: 8.3 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 288, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...its always useful to carefully have the past time understood. In my humble opinion, getti...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...e established by the ancient Egyptians. Thats why The Egyptian Government always allo...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 786, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
... Those activities succeeded to grab the worlds attention toward the African nation whi...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, nevertheless, nonetheless, so, well, no doubt, as a result, in other words

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2138.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 414.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16425120773 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97532384538 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 212.727598566 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.613526570048 0.524837075471 117% => OK
syllable_count: 678.6 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2977296156 48.9658058833 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.526315789 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7894736842 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42105263158 5.45110844103 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127474790919 0.236089414692 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0331778109044 0.076458572812 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0309942241644 0.0737576698707 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.070129286229 0.150856017488 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0220772663106 0.0645574589148 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 86.8835125448 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.