TPO 41
It goes without saying that pedagogues have been considered as one of the most important building blocks of a community since ancient times. Personally, I opine that teachers nowadays are more praised than they were in the past. I feel this way for two reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, teachers nowadays have an enormous influence on the development of societies. Each society needs large amount of talented juveniles who are prepared to handle different problems of their community by their teachers. It is obvious that a nice and intimate atmosphere is provided by governments and parents and even students in which pedagogues are praised. If teachers are acclaimed, they will be more encouraged to be more efficient in teaching. Consequently, this efficiency helps societies to make fantastic progress in tremendous speed. My personal experience is a compelling example of this. About five years ago, I had a mathematics teacher who was very serious and energetic. He taught different issues in a new way that students enjoyed a lot in his classes. After six months, my friends and I decided to buy him a gift just because of his hard-working and responsibility. As a result, he tried more than past, so students learned different problem solving methods, which definitely have prepared them to help their community.
Second, teachers were using physical punishment to discipline students in the past; hence, most of the youngsters did not appreciate their teachers. Nowadays, pedagogues and pupils have a great relationship with each other, and most of the young people love their teacher. This good relationship leads students to know the value of their teachers properly. However, teachers nowadays have more responsibilities; they are more satisfied because their value is known by their community.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that teachers nowadays are more acclaimed and valued. This is because they have an ample effect on the society in comparison with the past, and pedagogues do not use physical punishment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-21 | dr.samiaelwakil | 71 | view |
| 2021-08-17 | nida fatima | 66 | view |
| 2021-08-15 | TOEFLpreparation | 66 | view |
| 2021-07-10 | vida00 | 76 | view |
| 2021-04-06 | ursula | 60 | view |
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 3
- TPO_53 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents' jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents' jobs.Use specific reasons and examples to supp 76
- TPO 42 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 724, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a new way" with adverb for "new"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...d energetic. He taught different issues in a new way that students enjoyed a lot in his clas...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, hence, however, if, second, so, i feel, in conclusion, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1741.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 333.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22822822823 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95699897566 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561561561562 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.0025721019 48.9658058833 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.6315789474 100.406767564 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5263157895 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.31578947368 5.45110844103 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 11.7677419355 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 58.1214874552 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.