The maps below show the layout of James Park in 2017 and the proposed changes to the park in 2027.
The maps describe the structure of the James park in 2017 and the layout after the renovation in 2020.
Overall, the visitors to the park in 2017 are 5,000 and are expected to increase about 20,000 in 2027. In addition, Some noticeable changes were planned for 2027.
In 2017, The Statue is located at the center of the park. Science centre was to the northeast of the park. The fountain was located at the north-west of the park followed by a Toddler playground at the south-west and Main playground to the south-east. Moreover, there is a little gap from the north and south for the fountain and main playground respectively. The path was very simple from left to right connecting Toddler playground and Main playground.
As per the plan, Toddler playground will be replaced by Theatre, Gymnasium is planned to be added in the gap in the south and science centre will be expanded furthermore to the right. In addition, the fountain will be replaced by the garden and statue will remain unaltered. On the other hand, Path is planned to become more complicated from left to right connecting everything.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-21 | Hanana | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-10 | ieltsexam | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | Krushnagopal | 84 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | Krushnagopal | 67 | view |
- The maps below show the layout of James Park in 2017 and the proposed changes to the park in 2027. 84
- Some people think that developed countries have a higher responsibility to combat climate change than developing countries Others believe that all countries should have the same responsibilities towards protecting the environment Discuss both these views 55
- Jenny is conducting a research project on cell phone use. The chart shows the percentage of students, and parents of students, at Jenny’s school who owned cell phone over a 14 year period. The table provides the cell phone ownership rate nationwide ov 78
- The charts below provide the primary reason tourists visited Orange City in two different years. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- More and more companies allow their employees to work from home or “remotely” rather than going into an office each day. Do the advantages of this policy outweigh the disadvantages? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, moreover, so, as to, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 928.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88421052632 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69851708533 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468421052632 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2339043932 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.3636363636 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2727272727 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.81818181818 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203073419012 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982579883817 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114782048676 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173843836151 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136911803074 0.0819641961636 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.97 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.