The maps below show the layout of James Park in 2017 and the proposed changes to the park in 2027.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The maps below show the layout of James Park in 2017 and the proposed changes to the park in 2027.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The two maps illustrates the expected changes of facilities in James Park between 2017 and 2027. While Science Center will be expanded, two Playgrounds will be consolidated into one next to a newly added Gym. Theater and Garden are also planned to build in the park. By such changes, the park estimates 4 times bigger number of monthly users as of 2017 in a decade.

One of the most notable differences in ten years is the extended Science Center. Its space will be about twice larger than as of 2017 in ten years. As a result, the current space for Fountain will be used for Science Center and Garden which will be introduced in 2027.

In addition, in 2017, the park had two Playgrounds, but according to the proposed map of 2027, these Playgrounds will be one, relatively small Playground in the left side of the map. After the Toddler's Playground, Theater will be built and also, un the blank space just below the Main Playground in 2017 will be Gym in 2027. With such investment, the park facilities will be more attractive to wider age groups whereas in 2017, its main facilities were for small children and their families.

Other than that, there is a minor change in Path which will connect each new facilities, while the statue will stay in the same place.

In conclusion, the proposal including expanding existing facilities, developing new ones, and removing old ones will increase the park's users significantly from 5000 to 20000 in the estimation.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-11-21 Hanana 73 view
2019-11-10 ieltsexam 73 view
Essays by user Hanana :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, whereas, while, in addition, in conclusion, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 1.00243902439 1197% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1227.0 965.302439024 127% => OK
No of words: 253.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84980237154 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61555571836 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 106.607317073 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 351.9 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3779292662 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.25 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178291752208 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837535924434 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0795933598873 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100061001446 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731295113707 0.0819641961636 89% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.