Tpo Delta 6 exam
Both the article and the lecture revolve around the potential effects of exposure to several environmental stimuli on the development of each organism, groups, and populations. According to the reading passage, the author emphasizes that many environmental elements can incredibly affect the physical and intellectual attributes of young children and animals and have an immeasurably extended effect on their long life as well. In the conversation, the professor elaborates on the mentioned points of the reading passage by providing relevant examples.
First, the article claims that exposure to some individual stimuli can positively initiate the ideal growth of individuals and enhances their resistance to various kinds of stress. The lecturer sheds light on that point by giving daily handling and cold as compelling examples. In other words, hugging, kissing can dramatically promote the optimal growth of young children and boost their immunity. On the contrary, frequent exposure to cold can drastically influence the growth of some species of animals and left them vulnerable to many diseases.
Second, the article states that early exposure to some environmental elements, before and after birth, can significantly affect the physical characteristics of individuals. The professor elaborates on that by providing deers and rats as examples. In other words, environmental stimuli like scarcity of food could adversely have an extendable effect not only on the growth of young deers but also on their future generations. Also, rats exposed to a low protein diet in their early life will voluntarily opt to receive the same diet throughout their life, even in the presence of other protein-rich diets in adulthood.
Third, the article states that some environmental stimuli may affect the intellectual abilities of individuals. The lecturer elaborates on that by proving young children as an example. He states that early childhood malnutrition can adversely influence not only the physical form of young children but also their intellectual abilities. Accordingly, it may result in their physical deformation and their inability to learn.
As you can see, the lecturer effectively supports the main three points introduced in the reading passage.
- TPO INTEGRATED 42 68
- TPO INTEGRATED 32 65
- tpo indpendent 21 3
- TPO-20 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with Teachers performance should be evaluated by students rather than by other teachers 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 294, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... as compelling examples. In other words, hugging, kissing can dramatically promot...
^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rmation and their inability to learn. As you can see, the lecturer effectively...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, may, second, so, third, well, in other words, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 10.4613686534 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 30.3222958057 168% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1933.0 1373.03311258 141% => OK
No of words: 342.0 270.72406181 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65204678363 5.08290768461 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05371387459 2.5805825403 118% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485380116959 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 603.9 419.366225166 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0058590174 49.2860985944 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.8125 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06452816374 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.3589403974 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.8541721854 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 5.55761589404 202% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.0289183223 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.2367328918 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 63.6247240618 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 10.7273730684 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.2008830022 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.