Governments should offer college and university education free of charge to all students.
Education is one of the basic needs of life. In an era when science and technology is engrossed in every nuance of our life the need to evolve is ever-growing. This makes education no longer a wish rather it has become a need. Education has now become an important tool of survival. Although our grandfathers could have made by without education, we can hardly imagine scratching out a living without education when even a trivial job requires some skill. In this context providing education free of cost to everyone sounds very logical.
We are living in the twenty-first century when globalization and free markets have created opportunity that anyone can exploit to climb up the economic ladder. We can point out several examples of such progress. Recently, in one of my research tour I met a business man who used to sell newspaper in the sultry summer during his teenage days. I cannot afford to forget the fact how the education he acquired struggling in those streets was helpful in guiding his steps to this condition.
However, many people might not even get the job like selling newspaper to fund their education though many of them posses both ability and passion to pursue education. For instance, I had a friend who, without parents to support him for education, was funded by the donor organization until secondary level. He was very sharp and possesses the level of enthusiasm for study that barely anyone in our class had. He dreamt of becoming a doctor. However, despite his capabilities he had to give upon his dream as there was no one to fund his higher studies. If only there was a provision of free education, our country would have a very skilled doctor in future.
The proponent of the above argument might argue that making education free might decrease the motivation for continuing the study. Or in other way students might easily drop out of the education that they never paid for. But can’t we afford to trade-off these few students for the large number of passionate ones who are hungry for education? The other argument that the exponents might make is that the public spending would be very large in that context. However, won’t the spending made in present days would create huge number of the skilled manpower in the future that would boost country’s economy tremendously? Everyone of knows the answer and subsequently the need of education to be free and accessible to all.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | nikhil40507 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | shuocurity | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-04 | terraventu | 83 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | jha | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | Akhil_Maddukuri | 54 | view |
- The following appears in a letter to the editor for the West Lansburg News:"The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg. Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions. Since they were declared 77
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 58
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 66
- The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders; if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked, both its economy and national identity are endangered. Because illegal immigrants pose such threats, every effor 59
- In the age of television, reading books is not as important as it once was. People can learn asmuch by watching television as they can by reading books 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 228, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ger a wish rather it has become a need. Education has now become an important to...
^^
Line 5, column 651, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ountry would have a very skilled doctor in future. The proponent of the above argument...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, thus, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2020.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 413.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89104116223 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66677756767 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561743341404 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.8183083618 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8181818182 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7727272727 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.21951772744 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111176913413 0.243740707755 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0387037642991 0.0831039109588 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444171575859 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0684775385151 0.150359130593 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344363883715 0.0667264976115 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 14.1392134831 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.