To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.
In fact, each university tries to attain better ranking among other universities and scientific organizations. Although, some people claim that for making proliferation in process of training in universities, educational centers should give higher salaries for professors; but I do not think so. In my view, there are other important factors which determine the level of a university like equipment, informative sources, and students's both mental and physical conditions. I feel this way for 3 main reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
First, regarding that issue of necessity of having up-date references for better training, one might suggests that libraries and scientific websites are more momentous. To clarify, 5 years ago, when my country was in a kind of sanction, I could not easily reach to professional source of information for doing my thesis in my university. Not only did I spend much money for having access to information have needed, but I also could wast much time on this process. Had not my university increase the professor's salaries, I could finish my thesis on time.
Another aspect of being famous in training system in universities is having developed instruments. For example, in above mentioned story that happened to me, during sanction one of vital device for evaluating structure of molecules in my chemistry laboratory broke down. As a result, I could not be certain of correct synthesis of my molecules. Besides, I could not write my scientific papers on time. In the same time, my university wasted high financial supports on professor's awards.
Most importantly, having considered students's skills to communicating with society, some individuals might proposes that a part of universities' budget should devote to social's events, workshops and other stuff like that. For instances, sports clubs, musics, etc. for improving the quality of universities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | supergirl20 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | soheila123 | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | kangyan | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | kangyan | 76 | view |
- TPO 7 Question: Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on specific points made reading passage.American wood companies ecologically standard 90
- In order to be well informed a person must get information from many different news resources 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- tpo39 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 277, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sports clubs, musics, etc. for improving the quality of universities.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, regarding, so, for example, for instance, i feel, in fact, kind of, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 15.1003584229 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1618.0 1977.66487455 82% => OK
No of words: 300.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39333333333 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04448499567 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.63 0.524837075471 120% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 618.680645161 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3636123133 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.125 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 20.6045352989 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.45110844103 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27898156868 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0866201990467 0.076458572812 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0659572215236 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163501264993 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524625829027 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 11.7677419355 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 10.9000537634 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.