describe the share of world production between Asia, Europe and the rest of the word from 1960 to 2000
The chart provides insights into the change in the proportion of world productions based on three different categories over the time period between 1840 to 2000.
Overall, Europe loses its competitive edge over time. In comparison, countries besides Europe and Asia gradually take up more percent and become the second most contributor to world production, which is slightly blow the share of Asia.
According to the graph, the proportion of world production by Asia first situated around 50 percent in 1840 and experienced a continuous decrease. it first changed over from 30 percent in 1880, through 25 percent in 1920, and to 20 percent in 1960. However, a nearly twofold increase was witnessed and the share for Asia reached over to about 40 percent in 2000. Compared to the continuous drop for Asia, the contribution from the rest of the world has shown an upward movement with an increasing rate of about 10 percent per 40 years until 1960. Surprisingly, a transformation of 10 percent in 1840 to just below 40 percent in 1960 was indicated. Afterward, a 5 percent drop from 1960 to 2000 made it the second big contributor to world production. While it is not the same case for Europe, its share fluctuated at 40 percent from 1840 to 1960 and reached its bottom with about 22 percent in 2000.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-07 | wanglangdi21 | 73 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 213, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'blowed', 'blown'.
Suggestion: blowed; blown
... to world production, which is slightly blow the share of Asia. According t...
^^^^
Line 13, column 148, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... and experienced a continuous decrease. it first changed over from 30 percent in 1...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1092.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89686098655 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7394001859 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542600896861 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6662324906 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.2 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301129646606 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125838541295 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520148202788 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190131833117 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029192219997 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.91 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.