some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you. Do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that we are drawing too much concern and squandering resources in the conservation of wild animals and birds. I partly agree with the point of view because some certain aspects of animals haven’t been focusing on protecting animals.
There are many reasons why some aspects of protecting animals should be invested more time and money. Firstly, in terms of habitat, because of the rapid population growth of humans, which leads to forest destruction. Consequently, more and more animals faced a lack of environment with surviving and reproducing. For instance, by constructing a wind plant requires a huge land, affecting animal habitat, especially many kinds of birds died by the turbine. Secondly, some people believe that animals could be a method of health treatment, giving rise to illegal hunting in many countries. For example, in Africa, rhino horns are exploited by hunters, then buying to wealthy people for disease cures such as cancer.
On the other hand, people also paid too much attention to the protection of animals. Many non-government organizations play a vital role in conserving animals and accusing of actions which adverse to animals particularly, and the environment generally. For instance, the WSPA is an international non-profit animal welfare organization, which was born in 1981, aiming to encourage more people to support us transforming animal’s lives. Another reason is that the amount of money was prior invested in conserving endangered species instead of upgrading in infrastructures or improving living standards in some regions.
In conclusion, for the reasons I have mentioned above, I still partly support that we are concentrating too much and greatly allocating on animal survival.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-08 | Phạm Phú Trường | 78 | view |
- Topic: as well as making money, business also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree 84
- : Many countries use fossil fuels such as coal or oil as the main resources of energy. However, in some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. Do you think it is positive or negative developement. 89
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face to face contact with others Is it a positive or negative development in your opinion 78
- Some people say that too much attention and too many resources are given in the protection of wild animals and birds. Do you agree or disagree about this opinion? 61
- Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of the old house in the local areas, while other think that people should have freedom to build house of their own styles. discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, still, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44117647059 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0879879978 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602941176471 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.7457602792 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.846153846 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6923076923 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252919378872 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0928535953478 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750915724603 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161656856827 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568940173298 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.