It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?
Today’s world is dominated by the technology developments. Some people think technology and the culture are completely different and cannot exist together. In my perspective, I agree that the technology and the culture are work as oppose way.
It is inevitable that modern world has many achievements by using the developed technology. People are more flexible for the work consuming less time compared to the past days. For instance, mobile phones, internet, mobile applications, robots and there are enormous inventions whereas ease the work as well as save the valuable time. However, this advance achievement caused for the cultural decline. Nowadays people are communicating with the peers around the world by using gadgets.
So the languages, clothes, fashions are some of the areas in culture being highly influenced to lost by the technology.
On the other hand, recent days there can be seen budget flights which affordable for even low income earners. So people intend to travel for other countries. In terms of traveling, travelers embrace the new culture in different way. Many times the new trend is coming by mixing up the two cultures. Also the differences in two cultures make conflicts most of the time. Traditional methods not make any senses or value for the foreigners. In Sri Lanka, people enter to the temple with white colour clothing. However, it has no importance for foreigners to follow it.
To conclude, I believe traditional culture and the technology are two different factors whereas, the technology involves to makes changes in the culture. So it cannot take together as them work on oppose way. Technological devices and budget flights that gifted by the technology are some examples which affect for the cultural decline.
- Rich countries should allow jobs for skilled and knowledgeable employees who are from poor countries. Do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 67
- When choosing a job, the salary is the most important consideration for many. Others, however, prefer different other aspects of a job over the salary they earn. 73
- When choosing a job, the salary is the most important consideration for many. Others, however, prefer different other aspects of a job over the salary they earn. 61
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014. The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period.Summar 73
- The charts show what the Australian school leavers did immediately after leaving secondary school. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 41, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...So the languages, clothes, fashions are some of the areas in culture being highly influence...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 300, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...s coming by mixing up the two cultures. Also the differences in two cultures make co...
^^^^
Line 13, column 125, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'make'.
Suggestion: make
...ors whereas, the technology involves to makes changes in the culture. So it cannot ta...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 306, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
... the technology are some examples which affect for the cultural decline.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, well, whereas, for instance, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1495.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28268551237 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82386325773 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56183745583 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.6043706029 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.75 106.682146367 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.15 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.05 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 3.4128256513 322% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23894134441 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071081331209 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0716166751382 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148426092738 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0744152948352 0.056905535591 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.75 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.