The charts below show the total number of applicants the year before and the year after Doolittle University’s social media advertising campaign, organized by age range and how close the applicants live to the university.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts illustrate the total number of applicants, during the previous year, and the next year of the social media advertising campaign held at Doolittle University. The candidates are classified based on their age and the distance they live from the university.
Most age group candidates, living within or further the area of 100 km from the university, saw an increase in the number of applicants after the advertising campaign. However, applicants of age groups 23-29 and 30-39, living away from the university, saw a slight decrease in figures.
Aspirants aged between 18 to 29 years and living near the university saw a small increase of around 20 people after the campaign. Similarly, candidates who are above 40 years and living further than 100 km away from the university saw a little boost. On the other hand, candidates within the age group 18-22, who are living remotely, and candidates above 30 years, who are living in the vicinity of the university, saw a drastic change in numbers.
Altogether, irrespective of the distance, the number of applicants in the age group 18-22 is greatest, and the age group above 40 years is least, after the campaign.
- the chart below shows the highest educational degree earned by King City residents and the average household size in King City from 1950 - 2000 67
- Some people prefer to work on school projects with a group, while others would rather work alone. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 73
- Many people have difficulty maintaining a healthy diet.What are the causes of this problem? How could it be solved? 61
- The bar graph shows the global sales (in billions of dollars) of different types of digital games between 2000 and 2006. 67
- Many people have difficulty maintaining a healthy diet.What are the causes of this problem? How could it be solved? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, similarly, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 989.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07179487179 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79735951387 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.492307692308 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7795138415 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.625 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348485452676 0.215688989381 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172559456707 0.103423049105 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0890709524251 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237464994132 0.15604864568 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0670013481734 0.0819641961636 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.