Offering 4-day workween
Both the reading and lecture are about offering 4-day workweek for employees. Whereas, the author of the reading states that in today's world, many individuals like to have a 4-day workweek job. The lecturer says that suggesting a 4-day workweek duty is not effective for workers. He provides three reasons to support his points.
First of all, according to the reading, an obligatory policy is requesting factories to suggest the option of working 4-day workweek jobs for employees who can arrange their time to work partly or 4 days in week. Nevertheless, the professor disputes this point and says that employing 4-day workweek worker will cost the companies an arm and a leg. He points out that having more employees need more space, more offices and computers. On the other hand, he believes that hiring more employees will diminish the economy of the company.
Secondly, the author claims that companies’ profits will increase if they hire more employees; however, the hired employees would feel relaxed. Furthermore, the lecturer refutes the points mentioned by author. He asserts that employing more workers would put an end on the company's economy. He says that after hiring 4-day workweek employees, the factories’ expectations would increase and they would ask workers to work 5 hours instead of 4 hours in a week. Anyway, he says that it will draw off the desires of the workers and causes they leave their jobs.
Finally, the author claims that 4-day workweek option will help employees to spend their time not only on their office works, but also they can facilitate their personal activities. Moreover, the lecturer rejects this point and states that presence of workers will amplify their interests for work. However, he believes that 4-day workweek will diminish the ability of workers because they are not completely engaged with their job. Also, the lecturer says that companies hire more employees in any major they need; therefore, the hired employees will lose their jobs as soon as the factories hire new staffs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-11 | masoumsaie | 85 | view |
- Offering 4-day workween 85
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In my country young people have a better life today than their parents enjoyed when they were young Use reasons and examples to support your answer 79
- Dinosaurs endothermic 87
- Who do people go to university? 73
- Do you agree or disagree to the statement that says young people have better life than older people do? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... three reasons to support his points. First of all, according to the reading, ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... diminish the economy of the company. Secondly, the author claims that compani...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ers and causes they leave their jobs. Finally, the author claims that 4-day wo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, anyway, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 5.04856512141 317% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 22.412803532 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.01324503311 20% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1729.0 1373.03311258 126% => OK
No of words: 334.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17664670659 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56279030586 2.5805825403 99% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502994011976 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 498.6 419.366225166 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8944937708 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.705882353 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6470588235 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.29411764706 7.06452816374 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121863350812 0.272083759551 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0505835705312 0.0996497079465 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667825750935 0.0662205650399 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0948008009628 0.162205337803 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654244474563 0.0443174109184 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.