No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field.
The significance of cross field interaction have been debated for a long time. Personally, I believe that having outsiders to participate in a field or a researcher taking a new aprroach from another subject is beneficiary for academia without doubt, while the statement that no achievement of import can be made without it is still too arbitrary.
one of the first advantage of infusing kew knowledge or experience from another field is to bring what were originally altogether back. The history of science have bifurcate subjects that have tight connections to different area in academia, and such fact makes introducing ''new'' knowledge actually making the fractured pieces together. For example, archaeology, which has a long history with geology and paleontology are usually separated to different colleges after the founding father of modern anthropology, Franz Boas regarded it as a sub-field to understand anthropology. This makes it so awkward since there is no social-scientific methods to understand the minerals encompassed in potteries, and no doorways to deal with the ancient beasts' remains. using geological approaches to examine archaeological data, therefore, are definitely of import if people would want to solve the ancient mysteries.
another reason why many crucial scientific discoveries may not be achieves unless cross field collaborations are made is because lots of scientists usually preoccupy on using theories they are familiar with to solve the issues. Discourses or methods from outside may galvanize the researchers to think more broadly. For instance, the discovery of DNA structure couldn't be fulfilled without X-ray, the physical technology at-the-edge of that time. using such way to understand the genetic structure is just out of most biologists' thought in the mid-50s.
Nevertheless, the statement that no impressive scientific work were done without aids out of the field may be vulnerable to refutation. some are just findings that may be discovered one day. The excavation of Cambrian Lagerstatten may be one. what it only takes is time for people to discover.
In the nutshell, the collaboration among subjects are usually seen in important scientific studies. However, there are always some exceptions worthwhile to note that saying so may be dangerous.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-13 | smithsonite79 | 83 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | Kyunghwan Kim | 83 | view |
| 2019-10-28 | FaylEAVE0920 | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-19 | tuktuki1311 | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | wwwww | 66 | view |
- No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field. 83
- Traffic here in Waymarsh is becoming a problem. Although just three years ago a state traffic survey showed that the typical driving commuter took 20 minutes to get to work, the commute now takes closer to 40 minutes, according to the survey just complete 69
- In an attempt to improve highway safety, Prunty County last year lowered its speed limit from 55 to 45 miles per hour on all county highways. But this effort has failed: the number of accidents has not decreased, and, based on reports by the highway patro 63
- It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero. 16
- he surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists, but by the general welfare of its people. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
...without it is still too arbitrary. one of the first advantage of infusing kew ...
^^^
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'bifurcated'.
Suggestion: bifurcated
...ether back. The history of science have bifurcate subjects that have tight connections to...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 416, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng history with geology and paleontology are usually separated to different colle...
^^
Line 5, column 757, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Using
...o deal with the ancient beasts remains. using geological approaches to examine archae...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Another
...nt to solve the ancient mysteries. another reason why many crucial scientific disc...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...less cross field collaborations are made is because lots of scientists usually pr...
^^
Line 9, column 363, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...nstance, the discovery of DNA structure couldnt be fulfilled without X-ray, the physica...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 449, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Using
...al technology at-the-edge of that time. using such way to understand the genetic stru...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 137, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
... field may be vulnerable to refutation. some are just findings that may be discovere...
^^^^
Line 13, column 244, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: What
...on of Cambrian Lagerstatten may be one. what it only takes is time for people to dis...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, while, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1965.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 355.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53521126761 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14089686056 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585915492958 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.9429343314 60.3974514979 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.588235294 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8823529412 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05882352941 5.21951772744 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199368108088 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550087677962 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648413120749 0.0758088955206 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0999770182803 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.072011794718 0.0667264976115 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.1639044944 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.