agree or disagree: going to travel with a tour guide
The time one spends on travel is one of the most crucial periods in life, as it leads to new experiences and a large amount of cultural information, Hence of the most controversial issues among many people is whether to go with a tour guide or alone. As far as I am concerned, in the state of ambivalence, I might lean toward traveling alone. Conceivably, some people prefer a guide accompany, however, many reasons such as the flexibility and expenditure which are paramount parts of the travel can declare a higher beneficiary of traveling without a tour. I will interpret my reasons in the following essay.
First, a flexible schedule is advantageous to the valuable experiences included in the free trip. Doubtlessly, such experiences help to broaden the enjoyment during a trip. Consequently, this will enrich one's cultural information. To have a flexible time-table one needs to make a personal schedule and consider preferences such as favorite foods, places to visit, etc. which a tour guide might neglect. As an illustrative example, many years ago, during my high school, time at Beheshti high school in Iran, we went on a trip to Rome with a tour guide. I seriously wanted to visit the Roman forums. In the beginning, everybody thought this would be a fantastic trip, and I was sure about visiting the forums, but this was not the case. Unfortunately, the tour decided to omit the forums from the visiting list, and many of us were disappointed. Although the trip was meant to make us happy, things did not go as planned due to the tour's decisions. As one can see, to make a flexible itinerary, one needs to make a personal one and a tour guide can not guarantee your perfect schedule.
Also, it is not presumptuous to judge another's travel expenditure according to the tour he or she will use. No man can ever truly say that using a tour will make you poor, but a man will lose a certain amount of money using it. People who appear comfortably enjoying a trip may be guiding themselves. There are times when a person loses the way, but it does not matter as long as the Google map exists. My personal experience is the foundation of my point. A person needs less fixed expenditure during a trip to spend on locals and foods and the money spent on a tour directly influences the total expenses treatment that is imperative to the left money decreasing. Surely, it must be wiser to respect Google map that to deny it and spend lots of money on a guide.
I am of the conviction that everybody needs free time during the journey to meet many locals, with whom you can talk and obtain experiences and money to spend. This is a personal suggestion and the effect benefits enjoyment and savings. Regarding the aforementioned reasons, I conclude that a tour is not a perfect choice for a normal trip. All in all, a coin has two sides and an edge to connect the sides; so, there are times when a tour is a must and one should not neglect that.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-25 | pezhmanlamei | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-13 | jimHsu | 76 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 80 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 66 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 66 | view |
- ZOO 71
- Students in a university club want to help others, but they can only choose one project a year, which one of the following is the best? 1. Help those students in a nearby primary school with reading and mathematics; 2. Help people who cannot afford to bui 70
- agree or disagree: going to travel with a tour guide 73
- Asking questions from coworkers or teachers and super-visors 73
- TPO 12 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 599, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'expenses'' or 'expense's'?
Suggestion: expenses'; expense's
...on a tour directly influences the total expenses treatment that is imperative to the lef...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, regarding, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 15.1003584229 126% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 52.1666666667 115% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2426.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 527.0 407.700716846 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.60341555977 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.79129216042 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75633533895 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.489563567362 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 783.0 618.680645161 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4259974354 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3076923077 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2692307692 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.03846153846 5.45110844103 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213590382456 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0548459973442 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647112146728 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140297515197 0.150856017488 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0718393730324 0.0645574589148 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 10.9000537634 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 10.002688172 150% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.