Groups are good for members
Both reading and lecture are about the group works. The author says that team working is beneficial for members, but on the other hand, the professor refutes the perception of the author and claims that team working is not helpful for members who work inside the team. The lecturer points out on the main topics made in the passage by providing three reasons.
First, according to the passage, the author asserts that team individuals have extraordinary knowledge which contribute all of them. However, the lecturer refuses this idea and explains that team members do not cooperate each other as well. He brings an example of a company that shows people of a team take free rights while there is a group work. He adds that when a factory did a research of its groups, it found that most individuals are opposite of each other and do not support the rules of the funder.
Secondly, it is stated in the passage that participating in group works is useful for group members. Therefore, the lecturer declines this opinion and says that a company do not go ahead quickly when there are lots of groups inside it. He gives evidence that members of the group need many meetings and sessions to accompany each other.
Finally, the author accepts that each individual has the opportunity to express his/her idea. Furthermore, the professor denies this idea and says that attitude of each member in the group influence on the other members. He states that the group member would ignore the idea which is not based on his/her believes.
To sum up, the author says that working in a group of member is useful; however, the professor does not confirm this opinion and says it is not good to work in a team. He provides many examples which point the author's opinions out.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-17 | masoumsaie | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree to the statement that says young people have better life than older people do? 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Overall, the widespread use of the internet has a mostly positive effect on life in today's world. 70
- Professors’ appearance on TVs 73
- Dinosaurs endothermic 87
- Offering 4-day workween 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e passage by providing three reasons. First, according to the passage, the aut...
^^^^
Line 5, column 382, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...p work. He adds that when a factory did a research of its groups, it found that most indiv...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... not support the rules of the funder. Secondly, it is stated in the passage th...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and sessions to accompany each other. Finally, the author accepts that each in...
^^^^
Line 15, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ich is not based on his/her believes. To sum up, the author says that working ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 22.412803532 147% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1373.03311258 107% => OK
No of words: 307.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79804560261 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39923895172 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488599348534 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 443.7 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 3.25607064018 215% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4736402558 49.2860985944 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2 110.228320801 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06452816374 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291607004777 0.272083759551 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0995486783898 0.0996497079465 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0881842448641 0.0662205650399 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175050382713 0.162205337803 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0732955839749 0.0443174109184 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 53.8541721854 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.2367328918 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.