The chart below shows the proportion of renewable energy in total enrgy supply in 4 countries from 1997 to 2010
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
A glance at the graph provide reveal the percentage of renewable energy in total energy supply in Australia, Sweden, Iceland, Turkey between 1997 and 2010.
Overall, it is evident that Iceland and Sweden witnessed a increase while Turkey and Australia saw the opposite trend.
Looking more details, the figure in Iceland was far more higher than any countries listed which is cited by approximately 50 percents in 1997, then rose up to 60 percents 2000 and increased to 70 percents in 2010. Similar to Iceland was Sweden. The proportion started at somewhere at the vincinity of 10 percents, climbed up higher and ended at nearly 10 percent in 1997, 2000, 2010 respectively.
In stark of contrast, Turkey and Australia saw a decrease. In Turkey, the data fluctuated, from 40 percents in 1997, it slightly increased to over 40 percents which plumped to 30 percents in the next 10 years. Austraila was follwed by with nearly 10 percents in 1997, gradually fell to just half of 10 percents in 2000 and 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-26 | Billynguyen1225 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | Billynguyen1225 | 78 | view |
- Today s schools should teach their students how to survive financially in the world today To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your knowledge or experience You shou 84
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 84
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus. Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990 1995 2000 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990 1995 2000 2005 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 58, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ident that Iceland and Sweden witnessed a increase while Turkey and Australia saw...
^
Line 5, column 53, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
... details, the figure in Iceland was far more higher than any countries listed which is cite...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 842.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92397660819 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67689379784 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573099415205 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.257343973 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.25 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0875968277174 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0398607375673 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528774060459 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0648006838351 0.15604864568 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0642544218957 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.