Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.
In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development?
Ever since the technology came in lime light, the way people communicate has undergone a sea change which has affected the relationships among societies. To my mind, this is a mixed development for several reasons, elucidated in the upcoming segments.
On the one hand, masses have started making online friends which affects their relationships a lot. To be more precise, online friendship does not come up with trust as most of them are fake. A BBC report 2013, for instance, revealed that 55% people, especially, youngsters got deceived online. Not only this but also they value less to their actual relationships like parents sibling, kith and kin since they have curiosity to make new friends on internet. Consequently, the less time is spent with their near and dear ones.
In contrast, technological communication has brought about various positive aspects; international communication is one of them. To illustrate, distance is no more barrier these days among masses and classes. As such global migrants can easily keep in touch with their family members which gives them sense of security and satisfaction. What is more, online communication has boosted the economy of nation due to the word wide trade which further paves the way to coordial relationships among countries.
In brief, I vehemently vouch that although, modern way of communication has ameliorated the level of society yet at individual level it has few limited drawbacks which can be overlooked.
- Some people think in the modern world we are more dependent on each other, while others think that people have become more independent.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 56
- Many people fulfill the demands of their children nowadays what are the causes effects and solutions 92
- most people accept that we live in a globalised world but not everyone agrees that is this is beneficial to what extent is globalisation of positive or negative development 84
- Plagiarism in academics has become a pressing problem in many countries today What are the causes of this problem What are some possible solutions 60
- plastic shopping bags contribute to the pollution of land and sea Some people think that they should be banned do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, look, so, for instance, in brief, in contrast, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1242.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 236.0 315.596192385 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26271186441 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98520181984 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.669491525424 0.561755894193 119% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 506.74238477 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.559217564 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182194063547 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0586129255662 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576433900356 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108002317208 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.066982306495 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.