Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more interesting to read a good book or see a good movie the second time than the first. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
I agree with the statement that it's more interesting to read a book or watch a movie for the second time than the first. I feel this way for many reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First and foremost, we do not get to learn all the details from the first time. In addition, it's common that some ideas are hard to understand or comprehend from the first glance. My own experience is a compelling example on what I mean. When I read the book "Cosmos" for Carl Sagan, I did not pick up certain concepts that were elaborated in many chapters. However, the second time I read it, I was intrigued by the information presented by the author.
Secondly, the first reading is alway stressful. This is mainly due to the fact that we are concerned to finish the book fast. On the other hand, reading for the second time allows us to be more focused and enjoy the book we have without any pressure. For instance, whenever I am working on a long book, I am often looking forward to reaching the end. Thus, I do not give myself the opportunity to relax and contemplate what I read.
Lastly, sometimes, we choose to read a book more than once because it's just a masterpiece. This mostly applies to breathtaking novels, such as the ones written by heavyweight writers. For example, I had so much pleasure and joy reading the novel "Withering Heights'.that I had it in my workplace so that whenever I went there, I was able to read a paragraph or two in any free time I had.
To conclude, I am of the opinion that reading a book for the second time is more enjoyable than the first. This is because some fascinating facts are just hidden between lines and we usually do not notice them at first. Besides, we take our time while reading or watching for the second time without pushing ourselves. Furthermore, some artworks are so exciting that they never get boring.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-17 | Uttama Shekhawat | 70 | view |
| 2022-04-25 | quench | 76 | view |
| 2022-03-03 | ishi_jais | 60 | view |
| 2021-09-05 | yara121 | 73 | view |
| 2021-04-07 | shubhamaggarwal | 80 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Success is defined by the amount of money someone earns Use examples and reasons to support your position 80
- To improve the quality of education, universities should spend more money on salaries for university professors. 76
- Robert E Peary was a well known adventurer and arctic explorer who in 1909 set out to reach the North Pole When he returned from the expedition he claimed to have reached the pole on April 7 1909 This report made him into an international celebrity Though 88
- Archaeologists have recently found a fossil of a 150-million-year-old mam-mal known as Repenomomus robustus (R. robustus). Interestingly, the mammal's stomach contained the remains of a psittacosaur dinosaur. Some researchers have therefore suggested 80
- barrrron'sss 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 17, column 391, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...so exciting that they never get boring.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, however, lastly, look, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, i feel, i mean, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 9.8082437276 10% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 52.1666666667 61% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.0752688172 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1977.66487455 79% => OK
No of words: 342.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5730994152 4.8611393121 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72388627603 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53216374269 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 618.680645161 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 18.0 9.59856630824 188% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3906616899 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.3157894737 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.89473684211 5.45110844103 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271307708649 0.236089414692 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0914225894686 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0976517000648 0.0737576698707 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174981256042 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0689686492738 0.0645574589148 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 11.7677419355 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 58.1214874552 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.1575268817 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.93 10.9000537634 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 86.8835125448 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.