Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more interesting to read a good book or see a good movie the second time than the first. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
I agree with the statement that it is more interesting to read a good book or see a good more the second time than the first. The reason behind this is that I believe if the genre of book or movie matches is of your interest then you found that story attractive. therefore, you never get bored and found the story of the book or the movie more interesting than before.
I always yearned to read my High School books again. At the time, I was fond of reading Shakespear's drama and proses from different writers such as O Henry, robert frost etc. Even, I still love to read one of the poems of robert frost" Road Not Taken ". this poem is based upon decisions that humans take in their life and that final decision changes their life. stories or poems related pylo always interest me. therefore, I never found books, with the same genre, boring. Every time I read the same kind of book again, it motivates me. it comes out to be more interesting than before.
Similarly, I think the same about the movies. In Cinematic stories, I usually watch horror or suspense genre movies. Let's take an example of the sherlock holmes movie series. I believe that no one will ever deny watching this movie again. As this movie is full of suspense and thrill, I never found, this kind of movie, boring. When I watch it again, Protagonist sherlock holmes always surprise me with his mind-blowing detective skills to solve the cases.
So, I can say that it is more interesting to read a book or to see a movie more than once if is related to your favourite genre.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-17 | Uttama Shekhawat | 70 | view |
| 2022-04-25 | quench | 76 | view |
| 2022-03-03 | ishi_jais | 60 | view |
| 2021-09-05 | yara121 | 73 | view |
| 2021-04-07 | shubhamaggarwal | 80 | view |
- Altruism 66
- People today are much better informed about international news than they were in the past 66
- While they are important for storing water and generating power dams also play a significant role in curbing global warming This is in spite of all the arguments against dams that are brought up by environmentalists One such complaint is that hydroelectri 71
- In the 1950s Torreya taxifoha a type of evergreen tree once very common in the state of Florida started to die out No one is sure exactly what caused the decline but chances are good that if nothing is done Torreya will soon become extinct Experts are con 70
- R robustus as a hunter 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 264, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...t then you found that story attractive. therefore, you never get bored and found the stor...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 265, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...bert frost' Road Not Taken '. this poem is based upon decisions that human...
^^^^
Line 4, column 374, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Stories
...that final decision changes their life. stories or poems related pylo always interest m...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 118, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
... watch horror or suspense genre movies. Lets take an example of the sherlock holmes ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 335, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ound, this kind of movie, boring. When I watch it again, Protagonist sherlock hol...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, similarly, so, still, then, therefore, i think, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 43.0788530466 95% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 52.1666666667 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 8.0752688172 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1285.0 1977.66487455 65% => OK
No of words: 285.0 407.700716846 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.50877192982 4.8611393121 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34588629684 2.67179642975 88% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 212.727598566 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515789473684 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 618.680645161 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.783653303 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 71.3888888889 100.406767564 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8333333333 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61111111111 5.45110844103 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341674110712 0.236089414692 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103321155569 0.076458572812 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144005438464 0.0737576698707 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236807756418 0.150856017488 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.171274202218 0.0645574589148 265% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.7 11.7677419355 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 58.1214874552 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.1575268817 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.58 10.9000537634 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 86.8835125448 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.