Many university students live with their families, while others live away from home because their universities are in different places. What are the advantages and disadvantages of both situations?
When starting to attend university, you wonder whether living with parents is better than living on your own. On one hand, staying at home is convenient for the student to concentrate on his academic goals. However, on the other hand, the students gain more freedom when they have to be responsible for their actions and as well as consequences.
With regard to living with your family, university students are able to focus on their studies. Parents would provide every fundamental necessity such as tuition fees together with pocket money and transportation, all of which are vital to university life nowadays. On top of that whenever the students get home from school, they don't have to make a shopping list for dinner ingredients, nor do they have to prepare and cook the meals. However, relying too much on their parents will prevent the student from the opportunities to learn soft skills and look after themselves. Despite this lack of self-reliance, the students still can focus on achieving academic success.
As far as living alone is concerned, the students can improve themselves to become a mature individual. It is undeniable that in addition to schoolwork, the student must also plan to do housework efficiently. For example, the students might have to think about what they are going to make for breakfast the night before so that they will be in class on time. Moreover, not only does the student have to make a budget for daily expenses, but some might also have to find a part-time job to finance themselves. As a consequence, their study time at home might be lower as compared to those who stay with their families.
In conclusion, both living at home and living independently have their own pros and cons. Academic excellence can be obtained at the cost of practical life skills, and vice versa.
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face to face contact with others Is this a positive or negative development 89
- In many nations people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units instead of a large extended family Is this a positive or negative trend 78
- There is no need to go out to see social cinema because it is better to see them on the TV or computer screen Do you agree or disagree 84
- There is no need to go out to see live performance because it is better to see them on the TV or computer screen Do you agree or disagree 11
- The world of work is rapidly changing and employees cannot depend on having the same job or the same working conditions for life Why is it the case Can you suggest some ways to prepare people to work in the future 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 40, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... With regard to living with your family, university students are able to focus on...
^^
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...the students get home from school, they dont have to make a shopping list for dinner...
^^^^
Line 9, column 568, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...their study time at home might be lower as compared to those who stay with their f...
^^
Line 13, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...with their families. In conclusion, both living at home and living independe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, moreover, so, still, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, with regard to, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9512987013 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7454000996 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564935064935 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.7845680589 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 101.666666667 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5333333333 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279773632898 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0978844532832 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.085126493184 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174773157758 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303605110608 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.