Which kind of universities do you prefer, universities whose graduates can find good jobs or universities where there are famous professors?
University, as we all know, for the majority of people is one of the crucial parts of life. Although it may seem exaggerated, at first sight, one may find this contention sensible. In this regard, many people believe that the universities whose graduates can find good jobs are preferable, while others think differently. I think providing infrastructure for finding a good job which is initiates in universities is far better than having famous professors. I will delve into two conspicuous reasons to elaborate on my standpoint.
The first reason that makes me hold this belief is the necessity of having a job. Although having famous professors bring noticeable academic opportunities to students, finding a good job has become a remarkable concern among people. Moreover, from an economic perspective, every human considered a human resource which should be beneficial for the government somehow; based on the government viewpoint, there is nothing more valuable than having a job for people. Therefore, having a job can positively influence GDP and bring welfare to the society. For instance, one of the most important government expenses is the money which spends on universities. So by working, people not only re-spend that money to the government but also bring benefits to the economy. Nevertheless, when a person ready to find a job? Without a doubt, the infrastructure of finding a suitable job should build somewhere; where is far more suitable than the universities?
Another equally noteworthy reason to bear in mind is the self-confidence, which emanates from having a good job. In comparison with an unemployed person or people who assign to the poor job, an individual who has a good job feels more satisfaction from his life; therefore shows better self-confidence as well. Based on an experiment which had conducted about the job, about which I have read an article, results showed that in similar circumstances such as the same education and social level people who can find a good job present better self-confidence rather than people who are unemployed or have an unsatisfactory job. Obviously, the job plays a dominant role in people`s life.
To summarize, contemplating all remarks, we can safely conclude that although having famous professors considered an excellent opportunity for students, finding a good job plays a fundamental role in the whole of their life. A good job not only beneficial for society but also favorable for individuals.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: it is impossible to be completely honest with your friend. 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should focus their budgets more on environmental protection than on economic development 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement: Your job has more effect on your happiness than your social life does. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Compared with people who live in urban areas, the people who live in rural areas can take better care of their families. 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 117, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...ich emanates from having a good job. In comparison with an unemployed person or people who...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, i think, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.0286738351 163% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 43.0788530466 42% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.0752688172 161% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2097.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 397.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28211586902 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16313026811 2.67179642975 118% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51637279597 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 661.5 618.680645161 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.4460708576 48.9658058833 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.368421053 100.406767564 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8947368421 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73684210526 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279520458456 0.236089414692 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917662430136 0.076458572812 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0870584548519 0.0737576698707 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18229579926 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571413668359 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 11.7677419355 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 58.1214874552 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.