Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In these days, a spate of problems and issues in the world and also in nearby from us have been quite too complicated to resolve them without specific and sophisticated knowledge about the relative field with them. That’s why many people have called our contemporary era ‘an expertise century’. However, if any judgment and opinion have to be derived from the only mavens, what is the popular? I will contend at the below that the role of expertise is conspicuously significant but it is not the only a necessary condition to make a judgment very critical.
Admittedly, in certain circumstances, critical judgment of work may be able to stem from the sophisticated experts. In aviation industry, for example, there are many fields of science involving with that such as physics, material science, and engineering, etc. Actually, the people not interested or related to the aviation are not likely to express their opinion in a possible emergency situation. In the dropping airplane from 30,000 ft, we may expect that the pilot’s judgment has more possibility to save the clients than that of just a layperson. In judicial parts, many society have required some of certificates if he or she wants to get a job in that parts; courts, law firms, prosecutors’ office. Many western and east asian countries have introduced a system ‘law school’ to educate a man or woman that they want to make their career in fields of law. But the educating period is three years the fact that supports making an expert is not easy and he or she has to be valued more in any given fields. To sum up, the experts’ decision and judgment is likely to be clearly critical than that of non-experts.
However, in the era of democracy, all opinion about an issue have been considered significant in many of fields in the world. Political elections, for instance, the vote has all the same value, not lying to how many a voter has knowledge about the candidates and the policy. If the expert’s value is surely more valuable and phenomenal, the popular had better decide who is the proper candidate only by considering about the pundits’ comments from TV programs. I don’t mean to degrade their roles in a political judgment, however the normal people’s free will to vote is not be able to be decided only by those thought. Furthermore, the popular culture is now a main cultural trend in our contemporary era. That’s why the majority of people’s judgment about a movie, concert, singer, and some TV programs have been so significant in the producers and companies relative to the culture industry. Many rating in a number of movies have been differentiated, which rating is high in experts, but very low in populars. That means the movie is likely to be artful and sophisticated, however, it also is not likely to lucrative the fact may be more important to a movie producer.
In conclusion, the critical judgment of work may have more value if it comes from an expert, maven, and pundit. However, in the lights of the counterparts above, the laypersons and the popular’s opinion should not be neglected that it is likely to feckless and baseless.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-07 | wangweichieh | 70 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | Caveira meyona | 66 | view |
| 2018-06-14 | Pruthvi | 50 | view |
| 2015-08-27 | uwer1609 | 60 | view |
- In any profession—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, b 54
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for th 66
- Some people believe that our ever-increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction. Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another. Write a re 94
- Essay topics: Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the posi 62
- In this age of intensive media coverage, it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for t 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 559, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... clients than that of just a layperson. In judicial parts, many society have requi...
^^
Line 5, column 578, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun society seems to be countable; consider using: 'many societies'.
Suggestion: many societies
...of just a layperson. In judicial parts, many society have required some of certificates if h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 605, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'some of', you should use 'the' ('some of the certificates') or simply say ''some certificates''.
Suggestion: some of the certificates; some certificates
...icial parts, many society have required some of certificates if he or she wants to get a job in that...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, all the same, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 79.0 58.6224719101 135% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2674.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 536.0 442.535393258 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98880597015 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81161862636 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02320792271 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 215.323595506 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.494402985075 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 856.8 704.065955056 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5923545021 60.3974514979 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 121.545454545 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3636363636 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22727272727 5.21951772744 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140925873073 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487726828767 0.0831039109588 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499615635459 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10510405823 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295314255995 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 100.480337079 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.