People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
People have to make a lot of decisions in their lives from simple one that are present in our day-to-day life to more difficult ones, which might determine one's future life. In general, people have individual approaches to decision-making process: some can decide just at the drop of a hat while other would spend hours thinking over the issue and doubting which path to choose. The statement claims that those who make emotion-driven decisions trying to back them up with logic afterwards are a poor example effective people. I fully agree with this statement, since
First of all, while human emotions can be overwhelming at a particular moment, they are in fact temporary, which means one should not rely on them when making important decisions. Our emotions are basically reactions to the events happening in our life or to particular actions of people surrounding us. Representing our immediate perception of things, these reactions might have nothing to do with our general attitude towards a particular issue. For example, in the light of the recent speech given by a 16-years old Greta regarding global climate change, one could have been moved by the sincerity of her words, by her true passion and concern over the future of our planet and immediately make a donation to some charity fighting against climate change. At the same time, in everyday life the same person might be absolutely indifferent to the global issues or even argue that there are no real threats to the environment. This example demonstrates how one can make decisions based on the instant emotions and feelings provoked by external forces.
Secondly, decisions made without a prior logical considerations are more likely to be wrong or ineffective. A good decision have to have strong reasoning behind it, since it it crucial when communication the decision to other stakeholders who may question your choice unless it is supported by convincing argumentation. It is hardly possible to persuade someone that your decision is the best if you have only relied on your personal intuition or feelings. On the contrary, logic is something that can be interpreted in the same way by many people and thus help them to come to a common agreement.
One may argue that some decisions simply should not be made through a logical thinking. For example, one may consider choosing a soul mate and argue that one’s feeling towards the other person should be the only criterion when deciding whether to stay with that person or not. The more one would analyse good and bad sides of the other person, the more doubts may arise which could finally spoil one’s relationship which could have been quite perfect before.
Nevertheless, I believe some logical thinking will never do any harm in any decision making process, be it love affairs or choosing one’s major in a graduate school. The best approach would probably be starting with appropriate analysis of the situations and possible consequences of your decision and then making sure that the decision you are going to make is in line with your feelings and believes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | GREprep021219 | 79 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | rajeshrawal | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | amusnakate | 33 | view |
| 2019-11-07 | Hitzee | 50 | view |
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 79
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 45
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 776, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gainst climate change. At the same time, in everyday life the same person might b...
^^
Line 9, column 50, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'consideration'?
Suggestion: consideration
... decisions made without a prior logical considerations are more likely to be wrong or ineffect...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 172, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: it
... have strong reasoning behind it, since it it crucial when communication the decision...
^^^^^
Line 17, column 409, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n line with your feelings and believes.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, thus, while, for example, in fact, in general, first of all, on the contrary, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 33.0505617978 127% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2607.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 515.0 442.535393258 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06213592233 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.763781212 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75079916237 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 267.0 215.323595506 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518446601942 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 828.0 704.065955056 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.0691906724 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.833333333 118.986275619 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6111111111 23.4991977007 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.21951772744 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313050897696 0.243740707755 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104808322812 0.0831039109588 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0784484167173 0.0758088955206 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192054847109 0.150359130593 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0839257030061 0.0667264976115 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 14.1392134831 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.66 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.