The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
The two diagrams depict the information about the route access to a city hospital from ring road and city road in 2007 and 2010.
Overall, we can see an enormous changes in 2010 compared to 2007 for the city hospital. The roundabout, bus station and the separate public and staff car park were allocated in the recent plan.
On the one hand, access to the city hospital is through ring road and city road. The city road connects to hospital road to travel city hospital with a roundabout and other one is between the ring road and hospital road in 2010. Between city road and hospital road, there are 6 bus stops are there in the 2007 plan. However, in 2010 bus stops were eliminated and replaced with the bus station.
On the other hand, in 2007 both public park and staff park were at the same site just beside the east side of hospital road but in 2010, public car park moved to east side of the city hospital just beside the ring road and the staff car park remained in the same place as according to 2007 plan.
- Many people have difficulty maintaining a healthy diet.What are the causes of this problem? How could it be solved? 61
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. 67
- Some young people believe it’s best to move out of their hometowns when they become adults, while others wish to live in their hometowns their whole lives. 67
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999. 67
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 841.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.42631578947 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.0495320728 2.65546596893 77% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.415789473684 0.547539520022 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.0843915666 43.030603864 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.125 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.437982487691 0.215688989381 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.239727937036 0.103423049105 232% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159125730991 0.0843802449381 189% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.296746168644 0.15604864568 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.156967249942 0.0819641961636 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.71 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.69 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.