TPO 25
in the reading and the lecture are both vassels were used electric batteries in ancient time, the atuor the reading provides three reasons, while tn the lecture, the professor holds a totally diffrent view. first of all, the author suggests vessels prodct metel wires, on the other hand, the professor reject thisidea and she says that it is incorrect, wires. remember, evidence showe vassels were discovery by local people not archaeologist local jiars. evidence showe that people found other material near the jars, and not trrain archaeologist. they have not the recognized an important other material. second, the text claims cylinders has with jars same shap, in cotrovery, the speaker refuts this information ads she says that it isnot true, but might copper cylinder original degsin to preserved scrolls, some discovery show that iron red and liquid in clay vassel can used and product electricity, could boran cylinder used for the one perpose and adapted another for peepose. third, the reading suggests that they had not devices that replied on electricty. in the other hand, the professot reject this statement and she syas that battery.can product mill shoke when toucthed, they could have interapted evidence for invisibal power, and people couls used to other that they had magical power used battery.
- whether young people help other persons 3
- TPO 25 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People living in small villages are more satisfied with their life than those who living in the cities 87
- If your teacher says something incorrect in a class, what will you do?1）Interrupt your teacher right away;2）keep silent;3）correct your teacher after class. 63
- TPO 41 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
in the reading and the lecture are both va...
^^
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: First
...rofessor holds a totally diffrent view. first of all, the author suggests vessels pro...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 361, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Remember
...d she says that it is incorrect, wires. remember, evidence showe vassels were discovery ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 456, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Evidence
...l people not archaeologist local jiars. evidence showe that people found other material ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 549, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...the jars, and not trrain archaeologist. they have not the recognized an important ot...
^^^^
Line 1, column 607, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Second
...recognized an important other material. second, the text claims cylinders has with jar...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 986, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Third
...erpose and adapted another for peepose. third, the reading suggests that they had not...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 1068, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...not devices that replied on electricty. in the other hand, the professot reject th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, third, while, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 7.30242825607 123% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 22.412803532 85% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 30.3222958057 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1105.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 211.0 270.72406181 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23696682464 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 4.04702891845 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.430212343 2.5805825403 94% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.635071090047 0.540411800872 118% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 21.2450331126 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 101.968132277 49.2860985944 207% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 138.125 110.228320801 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.375 21.698381199 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.125 7.06452816374 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.09492273731 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 8.0 4.19205298013 191% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 4.45695364238 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293922337548 0.272083759551 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106757453429 0.0996497079465 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391570751599 0.0662205650399 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.293922337548 0.162205337803 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.3589403974 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.8541721854 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.2367328918 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.42419426049 110% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 63.6247240618 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.498013245 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.