Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
It is often argued that the history is not much more important to the today’s society as it has outdated now. Although, history is belongings to the past, I believe the past things also valuable as it portrays the culture and the ethical values. Thus, I partly agree with this notion.
First and foremost, history was the very first beginning of the present achievements. In other words everything has its own unique history; Individual, place or a product. Past generation had sacrificed more with a minimum level of facilities at the old days towards fulfilment of present day achievements. For example, most of the scientific research have oriented based on past findings. Secondly, old moments are the very first time of the custom derive where people learn languages, ethical values and the achievements as well as the failures. Those are being good lessons for today.
Those opposed to the study of history believe that the present time have vital benefits as it is almost towards future goals and findings. Therefore, large number of people relies mostly with the present time considering the past has already gone. Nevertheless, they argue history is the time that cannot change anymore. So it is worthwhile to concern more on current time and having targets for the future goals. For instance, recent research has found people are more likely to forget their things belong to the past and rely more on recent experiences.
To conclude, I believe that the old time is important to shape up humans lives even it has outdated today. The culture and the believes where we received from our ancestors are more valuable as the same way things around us today.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-13 | Adeola Nafisat | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | Adeola Nafisat | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | pbansal | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | marin123 | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | marin123 | 61 | view |
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view? 61
- The bar chart below gives information about vehicle ownership in China.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information. 56
- People living in large cities have to face many problems in everyday life. What are those problems?Should the government encourage people to move to regional towns?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or e 73
- The diagrams below show the design for a wave-energy machine and its location.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.You should write at least 150 words. 56
- Rich countries should allow jobs for skilled and knowledgeable employees who are from poor countries. Do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 128, Rule ID: BELIEVE_BELIEF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'beliefs' (noun) instead of believes (verb)?
Suggestion: beliefs
...has outdated today. The culture and the believes where we received from our ancestors ar...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, as well as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98928571429 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58857133002 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.546428571429 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1109746819 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.3125 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131615163903 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444691481615 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0283464451279 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0751880420996 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314717110831 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.