Traffic and housing problems in major cities could be solved by moving companies, factories and their employees to the countryside.
Do you agree or disagree ?
The hordes of people migrating to other states due to traffic and lack of houses. The people who are working in organizations, industries could be vacated to rural side, then the traffic and housing problems would be solved in major cities. In this essay I completely agree with that because it could balance the population.
Perhaps the main compelling reasons why I agree to moving companies, industries to countryside is because there will be lot of development in the remote areas. The population in both villages, urban areas will be equal and that would be a huge benefit to whole country. By this there will be increase in employment. If this is increasing day by day, the basic needs to buy for every humans leads to be affordable, inexpensive and economical price.
The employment opportunity not be viewed as isolation. Another particularly essential part is increase in the land revenues in every areas in the country. If this is the case then it would able to increase in the financial conditions to government, to educate every people in every state, to protect environment throughout country and to avoid traffic accidents, problems.
However, the ambient insulating is not the only area which demands people attention. The migration of the employees and their companies to rural areas which in turn leads to lack of hospitality in the cities. The projects started by government could be incomplete; It would lead to revenue loss, pollution effect could be increase in rural areas, government could face lot of pressure.
In conclusion,moving to urban areas are made up of many advantages, allowing companies to develop in those areas would get failures too. The financial increase and government pressures has results. I strongly agree to migrate and develop remote areas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-10 | Anoopben | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | Bao Linh Le | 73 | view |
| 2018-12-08 | Nguyen Hai Viet | 61 | view |
| 2018-12-08 | Nguyen Hai Viet | 78 | view |
- Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture, others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
- These days More and more shops opens long hoursWhat are its Positive and negative developments ? 61
- Responsible tourist could preserve both the local culture and environment Some people think it is impossible to be a responsible tourist To what extent do you agree or disagree 79
- Nowadays, international tourism is the biggest industry in the world. Unfortunately, international tourism creates tension rather than understanding people from different cultures. To what extent do you agree or disagree ? 73
- These days people in some country are living in a "throw away" society which mean people use things in a short time then throw them away.What are its causes and what are its problems ? What could be done to address this issue ? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fit to whole country. By this there will be increase in employment. If this is in...
^^
Line 17, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , moving
...face lot of pressure. In conclusion,moving to urban areas are made up of many adva...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, then, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17064846416 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91148885406 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525597269625 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 477.9 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 9.0 2.52805611222 356% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1793118854 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6875 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3125 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 7.06120827912 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203166097048 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626898153651 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0654735034886 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109159561612 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0796949590273 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.