The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions from 1980 to 2010
The line chart illustrates how many people visited four places in Scotland including Aquarium, Castle, Zoo and Festival over the course 30 years starting from 1980
Looking at the graph, it can be seen that the percentage of tourists participated in Castle & Zoo experienced an increase. Meanwhile, the number of people went to the Aquarium and Festival decreased
In 1980, The percentage of tourists chose to go to the Festival was the highest with 30%, whereas the number of people came to Castle stood at just over 20%. By contrast, there were only 10% of the visitor paying a visit Zoo. Meanwhile, The Aquarium was picked up 20% of the traveller
Over the following 30 years, there have been significant changes. Specifically, the Festival's attraction fell strongly to under 20%. Although from 1980 to 1985 the figure for Aquarium went up rapidly and reached a peak at 35% but thereafter this figure dropped to 10%. While the percentage of human visiting Castle soared up to 45% in 1995, followed by a considerable drop just over 30%, despite some small fluctuation during the first 20 years, the figure for zoo significantly rose to 20 % in the last year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-24 | huyen nguyen ngoc | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-24 | huyen nguyen ngoc | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-04 | Nguyễn Minhh Thư | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 78 | view |
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 56
- Cycling is a healthier and more environmentally friendly form of transport Nevertheless cycling is getting less popular What are the reasons of this trend What can be done to make cycling more popular 79
- The chart below shows Japan s population by age groups starting in 1960 and including a forecast to 2040 89
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 89
- The percentage of female members of parliament in European countries (2000-2012) 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 971.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92893401015 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70815577923 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61421319797 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.3576074823 43.030603864 191% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.714285714 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1428571429 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17190334188 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749353440178 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0714340323507 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115376717461 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04976218861 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.