The graph below shows the number of male and female students studying at IT university from 1985-2015.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The graph below shows the number of male and female students studying at IT university from 1985-2015.

Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The line graph provides some information about the amount of male and female students studying at university from 1985-2015, overall shows over this 35 years period.

According to the graph, there didn't have any courses for female students in the 1985. However amount of male students was 5000. Then after 5 years data of female students a bit changed, progressively added 3000 students, also is great that women started to study. In the 2000 amount of male, also female students was tha same, it was about 18000, these statistics were gradually rising until 2010. In this period women students slumped over from 32000 to 29000, while amount of men students kept increasing. In the end in 2015 the number of male students was higher than female students, it's 40000 of male students, also 29000 of female students.

In conclusion, male students were always more than female students, these statistics were gradually increasing from 1985 to 2015, while female students dropped in 2010.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-18 Alibek5327 78 view
2019-12-18 Alibek5327 73 view
2019-12-17 Alibek5327 73 view
2019-12-17 Alibek6464 61 view
2019-12-17 Alibek6464 56 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 31, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
.... According to the graph, there didnt have any courses for female students in...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 87, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ourses for female students in the 1985. However amount of male students was 5000. Then ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 509, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...amount of men students kept increasing. In the end in 2015 the number of male stud...
^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... also 29000 of female students. In conclusion, male students were always m...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, then, while, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 838.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17283950617 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40547564154 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58024691358 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7012279407 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.75 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298816570342 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147275865015 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0911360728748 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248616965243 0.15604864568 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0758029397795 0.0819641961636 92% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.