some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. discuss both thees views and give your own opinion
There is no doubt that public health must be improved by providing facilities as much as possible, because a healthy nation can bring a healthy economics. Some people believe that providing sport facilities are the best way to improve the health of people whereas some people believe this would have minor effect and other strategies are rather important.
I totally agree with this idea and my opinion is that enhancing sport facilities is not the best way to improve the public health.
Firstly, it is important to look for the reasons that cause to reduce the health of public. Among them, food and dietary practices are in the first place. For instance, a lot of people prone to non -communicable diseases due to improper dietary practices such as skipping breakfast, excess intake of fatty foods and junk foods. In order to prevent such practices, people need to change their attitude and should adhere to proper dietary pattern and this is nothing do with improving sport facilities.
However, it is obvious that providing sports facilities can make a positive impact on public health to a certain extent, but it is not the best way to bring up the public health as sports facilities only develop the physical well -being only. In order to uplift the other areas of health such as social, mental and spiritual well-being, other measurements must be taken such as awareness programs,developing clinics, improving medical facilities and infrastructures.
In conclusion, even though sports facilities help to experience an enhancement of public health to a certain degree, I strongly believe that it is not the best way to improve the public health. It should be a combination of enhancing sport facilities along with other facilities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-19 | Amila Priynatha | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | Leeinho | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | MHT | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | Gholamirayaneh | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | junjunh | 78 | view |
- The two maps below shows road access to a city hospital in 2017 and in 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where necessary. 61
- some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required. discuss both thees views and give y 67
- the chart bellow shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 61
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems TO what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to improve the public health. Firstly, it is important to look for the reasons ...
^^
Line 7, column 397, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , developing
...must be taken such as awareness programs,developing clinics, improving medical facilities a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, look, so, well, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10839160839 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84060084395 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.506993006993 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 449.1 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.8794452075 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.818181818 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3636363636 7.06120827912 161% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360354515062 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.145380680054 0.084324248473 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0982804021951 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226361754126 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624435696831 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 78.4519038076 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.