The graph shows the consumption of fats between 1971 and 1997
The diagram provides information about three types of fat consumed in more than a quarter decade (from 1971 to 1997).
Overall, there was a downward trend in the number of two-type of fat (butter and margarine), while the figure for low and reduced-fat jams increase considerably.
Commencing at approximately 150 grams weekly per person in the initial year, the figure for butter then observed a minimal decrease in 1976. Following this, the number plunged considerably in the next two-decade, finishing the period at roughly 50 grams. Margarine, however, stood as the second-highest number (just below 100 grams) in 1971, dropping to about 70 grams in the next five-year, before surpassed that of butter in the 1980s at approximately 100 grams. After that, the number of weekly margarine consumption dip slowly, ending as the lowest figure in 1997.
The consumption of low and reduced-fat spreads begun in the 1980s of about 10 grams and it accounted 5 times higher in the next 7 years and ending the period as the figure.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | trinhthanh1 | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
- Task 2: Research shows that business meetings, discussions and training are happening online nowadays. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- some people get into debt by buying things they don't need and cant afford.what are the reasons for this behaviors?what action can be taken to prevent people from having this problem? 56
- The graphs below show information about citizenship in the UK. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK School in 1981, 1991 and 2001. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 165, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ext 7 years and ending the period as the figure.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, second, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 855.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02941176471 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83663624568 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576470588235 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9150572746 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.142857143 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15504077833 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754158469683 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612077762525 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107698705406 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415358459246 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.