The graphs below provide information on global population figures and figures for urban
populations in different world regions.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons
where relevant.
The line chart illustrates the changes of the world population from 1800 to 2100 and the column chart describes the differences in the number of people live in developed and developing areas from 2015 to 2040.
In general, the world population has gradually grown over the first 250 years to the peak before being forecasted to a decrease in the latter years. Meanwhile, from 2015 until now, citizens in developing countries have remained stable and are predicted to have no change from now on. By contrast, the number of city dwellers in developing areas has continuously grown from 2015 to 2040.
According to the line chart, the world population started at only 1000 million of peoples, then slightly and slowly increased to around 3000 million in 1960, before being predicted to surge to the peak of more than 8000 million in 2050 and suddenly going to sharply and rapidly drop to 6000 million in 2100.
In terms of people live in distinguish regions, developed areas have leveled out the number at about 1200 million of people from 2015 to 2040. While people in developing countries have gradually and continuously risen over this 25 years period, from around 2100 million to almost four times than that in the forecast of 2040.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-21 | Spring2019 | 11 | view |
- The table below presents the number of children ever born to women aged 40-44 years inAustralia for each year the information was collected since 1981.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisonswhere releva 78
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.You should writ 67
- More and more people buy a wide range of household goods like television microwave oven and rice cooker Do you think this is positive or negative development 73
- The restoration of old buildings in major cities in the world costs numerous governments' expenditures. This money should be used in new housing and road development. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types ofeducational setting in the UK in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisonswhere relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 388, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s continuously grown from 2015 to 2040. According to the line chart, the world p...
^^^^
Line 7, column 328, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...imes than that in the forecast of 2040.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, then, well, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1033.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91904761905 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50237528883 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495238095238 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 62.6291319057 43.030603864 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.571428571 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 22.9334400587 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 5.23603664747 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0436617484921 0.215688989381 20% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0233089462639 0.103423049105 23% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0233541886855 0.0843802449381 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.032032135554 0.15604864568 21% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0169887609034 0.0819641961636 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.95 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.85 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.