The graph shows estimated oil production capacity for several Gulf countries between 1990 and 2010.
<span style="font-size: 24.2px;">The bar chart compares six different nations, namely Qatar, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Kuwait, UAE in terms of the estimated amount of produced oil over the course of 20 years starting from 1990.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that five out of the six countries increased while the capacity of produced oil in Qatar remained fairly unchanged.
In 1990, the daily number of produced oil barrels in Saudi Arabia was the highest at more than 8.5 million, followed by Iran with 3 million casks. After 20 years, the oil production quantity of Saudi Arabia rose dramatically to 14.5 million crates per day, that of Iran only experienced a slight growth to over 4 million pipes.
In comparison, UAE, Iraq and Kuwait had a similar amount of made oil around 2 million containers every day. Surprisingly, all three nations climbed slightly at approximately 3.8, 4 and 3.5 million crates in 2010, respectively. However, the figures for Qatar was only 0.4 million and stayed constantly at that level during the twenty years.</span><br>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-05 | lehonganh | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-31 | hin07 | 73 | view |
- The chart shows the percentage of car manufacturer s total sales in North America South America Europe and Asia 84
- People living in large cities today face many problems in their everyday life What are these problems Should governments encourage people to move to smaller regional towns 84
- More and more people in the city live in small space without outdoor space Do you think it is a negative or positive development 84
- The table below gives information about the population in Australia and Malaysia in 1980 and 2002 78
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions from 1980 to 2010 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22857142857 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17805742232 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.685714285714 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.7025423783 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.714285714 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151963259742 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0672762761182 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373511634313 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.09260141474 0.15604864568 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0348831706087 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.