Technology make people lazier and too dependent on it.
Technology is very helpful nowadays. Technology can help people in every situation. But, there are many side effects that people can get when they always use technology. It is agreed that technology make people lazier and too dependent on it because technology help people to talk with other people and technology assist people when they are busy.
Firstly, talking with other people is very simple if people use technology. By using technology, especially mobile phone, people can be very helpful. If they want to communicate with other people, they just use their mobile phone. For example, if the manager want to held a meeting but the manager not in the office, they will use Skype for online meeting. Also, if students want to discuss some topics, they will use WhatsApp for discussing with their group. People feel helped by using technology. However, people will depend on technology because of the benefits. In short, technology make people lazier because they can communicate with each other by using mobile phone.
Other than communicating with other people, technology can assist people when they are very busy. Some people might not have enough time for cooking and shopping when they are busy. Thus, technology can help them in a crowded time. For instance, if a workaholic not have time to go out for buy food, they will use Grab Food to order some foods. Also, if a housewife is very busy to take care their children, they will order some cooking ingredients by using online shop. If they keep repeat these activities, they will be more lazy and depend on mobile phones. In brief, people will use technology when they are very busy.
To conclude, communiacting with other people and helping people when they are busy are the reasons why technology make people lazier and too dependent on it. People should use technology in the right way.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-11 | vuhongminh | 61 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | thuyan187 | 11 | view |
| 2024-09-10 | phamkhuyen | 61 | view |
| 2024-08-11 | MEBC Class | 61 | view |
| 2024-08-04 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, thus, for example, for instance, in brief, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97124600639 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42106762717 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 176.041082164 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.424920127796 0.561755894193 76% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8255678704 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.0952380952 106.682146367 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9047619048 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52380952381 7.06120827912 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.340391588275 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138944928091 0.084324248473 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.159349481217 0.0667982634062 239% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.323530767924 0.151304729494 214% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.191383216352 0.056905535591 336% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.0946893788 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.95 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.65 8.58950901804 77% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 78.4519038076 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.