a nation should require all of its students to study same national curriculum until they enter college.
Most of the countries announced the right of education in the Constitution. It is important to learn and study because through the process the acknowledgement could be ascended through generation which made the difference of humanity today comparing to other animals. The question is "Should the nation give everyone a certain level of equal education?". In my opinion, a nation should give most of the students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
The opponents of the statement would say that because the academic fields have become too many, it would be not enough time to learn about one specific field. It would be waste of time learning everything by providing same course. However, learning through the same national curriculum give citizens about general understanding of the fields. The perspective that having a same basic education become more important today because the era of synthesizing has come. Professor Jung, a famous neuroscientist in Korea, said that all scientists are great artists and all great artists are scientist. It means that experts start to find answers of the field from getting an idea from the different field.
Providing the general courses to the students also prevents the possible awkwardness that may occur by misunderstanding the other fields. It may seem a small problem, but the subtle difference to the scientist could be going between heaven and hell to the historian. For instance, when the scientist makes a false quotation that the first American president is Lincoln, there would be no big difference in science. However, if the historian heard this, he won't think the scientist as normal person.
However, not all students require the same speed of education. Students who are extraordinarily smarter than the average would think what they learn at normal school is boring. Leaving those students at the regular school would be a waste of time and money. For the students transcend the average, the nation should provide particular curriculum that could enhance one's innate ability to more powerful and acute strength, both for the individual and the nation. The good exemplar would be seen at international science olympiads. Each representatives of the nation have proved themselves that he has the best ability on the field and most of the representatives didn't take the regular, average national curriculum. In case of Korea, every one of representatives come from science specialized high schools.
In conclusion, I strongly recommend that the nation should provide the same national curriculum to most of the people. However, for the gifted students, the nation would provide particular courses to enhance the abilities and skills.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | AlmeeC. | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | lekuleku | 62 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | nikhil40507 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | greuela001 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | vineel | 58 | view |
- The following appeared in a memo from the vice president of a food distribution company with food storage warehouses in several cities Recently we signed a contract with the Fly Away Pest Control Company to provide pest control services at our warehouse i 78
- a nation should require all of its students to study the same national cirriculum until they enter college write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 66
- Colleges and universities should require their students to spend at least one semester studying in a foreign country Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the 63
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. 66
- It is more harmful to compromise one s own beliefs than to adhere to them Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 663, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...e field and most of the representatives didnt take the regular, average national curr...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2314.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 433.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3441108545 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94009259318 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501154734411 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 709.2 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.4365531758 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.608695652 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8260869565 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5652173913 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343016678885 0.243740707755 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0986232494383 0.0831039109588 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147558827792 0.0758088955206 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197973843133 0.150359130593 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122593457089 0.0667264976115 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.