tpo 22 using ethanol as an alternative to gasoline
The material discusses the concept of using ethanol as an alternative to gasoline. While the reading claims that ethanol fuel is not a good replacement, the listening challenges this and states that ethanol is a good alternative and all the reasons mention in the reading passages are not convincing.
First, the author points out that using ethanol fuel has no advantages over gasoline in the term of global warming since ethanol releases carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. On the other hand, the professor opposes this and posits that ethanol will not add to global warming. He states that it is true that ethanol fuel releases carbon dioxide, but ethanol is made from plants. The lecturer explains that growing plants to make ethanol will reduce carbon dioxide in the air. The speaker adds that plants usually absorb carbon dioxide as a nutrient to grow, so carbon dioxide will be removed from the air during this process.
Second, the writer cites that producing ethanol will consume plants that should be used to feed farm animals. On the contrary, the professor encounters this and brings up that using ethanol fuel will not reduce the source of food for animals. The lecturer says that ethanol is made from cellulose which is found in the cell wall of the plants, and this part of plants is not eaten by animals.
Third, the reading mentions that ethanol does not have the ability to compete with gasoline on price. Conversely, the lecturer contradicts this and points out that ethanol will be able to compete with gasoline in the future. According to the lecture, if more people start to buy ethanol fuel, the production of it will increase and that will lead to drop its price. The professor points out that if the production of ethanol becomes three times more than its production today, the price of ethanol fuel will drop by forty percent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-28 | Christine hanna | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-30 | nagy | 66 | view |
- tpo 23 yellow cedar 60
- tpo 29 81
- do you agree or disagree student should have a broad knowledge of subject rather than focus in one academic major? 73
- workers who do several tasks doing the workdays are more satisfied than those who do similar tasks all day long? 81
- do you agree or disagree? teachers should not make their political or social views known in the classrooms? 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, if, second, so, third, while, it is true, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1373.03311258 112% => OK
No of words: 316.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88291139241 5.08290768461 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35551050493 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 145.348785872 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46835443038 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 476.1 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 14.0 8.23620309051 170% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7268549311 49.2860985944 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.214285714 110.228320801 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 21.698381199 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.48663038434 0.272083759551 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.200931708893 0.0996497079465 202% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680515558758 0.0662205650399 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.307775244602 0.162205337803 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0283887932409 0.0443174109184 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 53.8541721854 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.0289183223 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.42419426049 92% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.