Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is.
In the progressive world where we are living, understanding the history of the world is beneficial for students. In this vein, some people believe that the history courses should be mandatory for all students in all fields at the university. In contrast, many others hold an opposite view and think that the university isnot a proper place to expand theknowledge of students in history, particularly in all fields except for the majors related to history. I personally concur with the latter group for two main reasons, on which I will elaborate in the following paragraphs.
First of all, the university should spend resources on the specialized courses in each field rather than general courses such as history, in order to enhance the ability of students in their own major. In fact, the students should be encourage to spend time and effort increasing their knowledge and their skills to pass the courses which are useful for being successful in their professional future. As a result, the universities should allocate the budget and resources to achieve this goal. If the passing history courses is compulsory for all majors, university should be responsible to provide classes and professors for that, adding up the expenses of universities. Thereforeapart from the history students, other students can refer to many books and journals available in libraries and the Internet to increase their knowledge about the history, if they are interested in.
Moreover, students should focus on the courses in which they are interested, getting a good mark and making more opportunities for them to get a perfect job. In other words, student do not allot time and effort to those courses that they are not interested in, particularly those which are not helpful for their future. They usually cannot be successful to get a good grade in those courses. Therefore, it causes a negative effect on the GPA at the university, as well as on their resume. As a result, it makes much difficulties to get a promising occupation. My experience can easily shed light on this concept. I personally did not favor history courses at the university, not allocating enough time to study it. Consequently, I could not get a good grade, which wasted my efforts spent getting a successful result in other courses, thereby causing a decline in my GPA, which made it difficult to apply for job in prestigious companies.
To conclude, the history course should not be mandatory for all majors for two main reasons described above. Not only does it increase the university's expenses to provide classes and professors for presenting that course, but also negatively affect the GPA of students who are not interested in history courses, weakening their professional resume.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. 76
- TPO 53 Task 1 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 243, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...udents in all fields at the university. In contrast, many others hold an opposite ...
^^
Line 3, column 52, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l, the university should spend resources on the specialized courses in each field...
^^
Line 3, column 236, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'encouraged'?
Suggestion: encouraged
... major. In fact, the students should be encourage to spend time and effort increasing the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'spending'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: spending
... fact, the students should be encourage to spend time and effort increasing their knowle...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 512, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
... on their resume. As a result, it makes much difficulties to get a promising occupat...
^^^^
Line 5, column 916, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ch made it difficult to apply for job in prestigious companies. To conclude, t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, apart from, except for, in contrast, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 13.8261648746 80% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2304.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 451.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10864745011 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87506464722 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 212.727598566 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485587583149 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 728.1 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8260211162 48.9658058833 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.263157895 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7368421053 20.6045352989 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.21052631579 5.45110844103 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.5376344086 108% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26722064134 0.236089414692 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897416399926 0.076458572812 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686592685315 0.0737576698707 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182468127152 0.150856017488 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639650332193 0.0645574589148 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 11.7677419355 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.