The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The provided pie graph demonstrates the underlying etiologies of worldwide land degradation, while the supplied table gives information about how three causes influenced negatively the land productivity in North America, Europe, and Oceania throughout 1990s.
At the first glance, the percentage of land which was degraded by overgrazing was the most worldwide and in Oceania. Whereas deforestation and over-grazing processes accounting for more than half of land degraded globally, they were also the main cause of land unproductivity in Europe and North America, respectively.
It is explicitly observed that 35% of the worldwide land was degraded as a sequel of over-grazing process, which made up the largest part of the chart. Additionally, the percentage of land which was degraded by tree clearance and over-grazing approaches was 30% and 28%, respectively.
Turning to the remaining datasets, the percentage of land which was degraded in Europe was 23%, which was the largest percentage in the table. Apart from this, over-grazing process was the main cause accounting for 11.3%. In Oceania, the total land degraded was 13%, which caused mainly by deforestation process. On the contrary, North America had the least percentage of land degraded (5%), and the principle cause of this was over-cultivation method (3.3%).
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and mak 73
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 67
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
- Some people say history is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that, in today’s world, subjects like science and technology are more important than history.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., Europe, and Oceania throughout 1990s. At the first glance, the percentage of l...
^^^^
Line 7, column 399, Rule ID: IN_PRINCIPAL[3]
Message: Did you mean 'principal' (=main)?
Suggestion: principal
...percentage of land degraded 5%, and the principle cause of this was over-cultivation meth...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, so, whereas, while, apart from, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1128.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55665024631 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18768316848 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536945812808 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1538559587 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.333333333 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123017624885 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682862053257 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483956416629 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0944040078421 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0463262865042 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.4140731707 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 11.4329268293 144% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.