The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.

Essay topics:

The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001.

The given pie charts displayed the changing pattern of annual expenditures in five different aspects by a school in the United Kingdom in the years of 1981, 1991, and 2001 .

A glance at the graphs reveals that the percentage of money which was spent annually on teachers’ salaries sector was the largest, whereas the amount spent on the insurance category was the least.

The percentage of money which was paid on teachers’ salaries experienced a noticeable increase from 40% in 1981 to 50% in 2001. Subsequent to that, this figure experienced a 5% decline to 45% in 2001; however, it remained the largest part of each chart. Similar to that, there was a 5% increase in the funding proportion of the resource’s category accounting for 20% in 1991, in contrast to 9% in 2001.

Turning to the remaining datasets, it is clearly obvious that 23% of the annual spending gone to the furniture and equipment category in 2001, relative to 5% and 15% in 1991 and 1981, respectively. Expenditure of insurance had increased to 8% in 2001, in comparison to 2% in 1981. Conversely, 15% of the money was spent on the other works category in 2001, in comparison to 22% and 28% in 1991 and 1981, respectively.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-28 Sandhu param 73 view
2020-01-25 Noah1997 33 view
2020-01-22 pateldhruv1708 67 view
2020-01-10 Ali Elameen 73 view
2020-01-10 Ali Elameen 67 view
Essays by user Ali Elameen :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 62, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...displayed the changing pattern of annual expenditures in five different aspects ...
^^
Line 1, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...changing pattern of annual expenditures in five different aspects by a school in...
^^
Line 1, column 174, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...dom in the years of 1981, 1991, and 2001 . A glance at the graphs reveals tha...
^^
Line 5, column 112, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pent annually on teachers' salaries sector was the largest, whereas the amou...
^^
Line 9, column 134, Rule ID: SUBSEQUENT_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'after'
Suggestion: After
...crease from 40% in 1981 to 50% in 2001. Subsequent to that, this figure experienced a 5% de...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 179, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...quent to that, this figure experienced a 5% decline to 45% in 2001; however, it ...
^^
Line 9, column 183, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t to that, this figure experienced a 5% decline to 45% in 2001; however, it rema...
^^
Line 9, column 403, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...counting for 20% in 1991, in contrast to 9% in 2001. Turning to the remaini...
^^
Line 13, column 335, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'works'' or 'work's'?
Suggestion: works'; work's
...15% of the money was spent on the other works category in 2001, in comparison to 22% ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, however, if, so, whereas, in contrast, in contrast to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1019.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89903846154 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99795035406 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524038461538 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 284.4 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4564330256 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.375 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260412088142 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12641862999 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0924396452296 0.0843802449381 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173577831254 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116741821195 0.0819641961636 142% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.