If you are going to graduate from the university and have to choose the final course, which professor will you choose? The one you used to sign up for courses or the one you have never learned from before.
In top universities, headmasters ask students to will pass a course at the final term because they think that, this course perhaps provides good conditions for students before their graduation. Actually, university managers want to create a chance for students to learn new things by new professors or old professors. Usually, colleges suggest two options for students that one of them is learning a course by the new professor, which he/she teach the new course, but the other suggestion is teaching by an old professor. In my opinion, the first option is better than the other choice. The reasons to substantiate my viewpoint are elaborated upon hereunder.
To begin with, the new professor teaches the new course definitely, so I can learn a new thing. The new lesson is more attractive than before courses, well, I have much more enthusiasm to study the new course, moreover, and I can use my time in the best form by studying the new course. For example, last summer, due to educational problems I forced to learn the optional course in the final semester. So, after days I decided to pass the biochemistry course, Also this course wanted to teach by the newly hired professor. Now, after one year I feel happy because I could learn new things about my field at that time, besides, I used my time very well. As you can see, the correct decision can have good results.
Secondly, in the new class, professors may talk about subjects, which students never had heard before, so it causes students to listen carefully. Better to say that, usually, new topics are taught by new professors, which can improve students' resumes. Consequently, they are able to find a good job after graduation because they have more information about their major. As a result, if I want to learn an additional course, I prefer to pass a course that has more benefits.
To sum up, taking all the reasons and examples into account, I believe that new professors are better than old professors because new teachers show new and fresh things, so students have more enthusiasm to hear novel subjects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-31 | NIMA SAEEDI | 76 | view |
- You have long been friends with someone. If they do something that you do not like, should you still be friends with him or her? 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Company should pay for employee to get university degree. 73
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they challenge the specific points made reading passage. bird populations decreasing 85
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific methods proposed in the reading passage. humpback whales navigation by stars 80
- It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in big city .Do you agree or disagree ? 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 443, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'teaches'.
Suggestion: teaches
...urse by the new professor, which he/she teach the new course, but the other suggestio...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, consequently, first, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, for example, i feel, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1729.0 1977.66487455 87% => OK
No of words: 356.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85674157303 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66366053127 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525280898876 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 527.4 618.680645161 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 9.59856630824 63% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9501899256 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0625 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.6045352989 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0625 5.45110844103 203% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188093463779 0.236089414692 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651716434835 0.076458572812 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389828799089 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114560909428 0.150856017488 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373694383744 0.0645574589148 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 11.7677419355 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.002688172 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.